< = back | = > Earthquake (Intro) < =

Blue links lead to the fully translated html versions of the page, purple links lead to pages whose start pages (as well as introductions and tables of contents at least) are already set up, green links lead to extern sites, grey means that no file is available yet).

/Notes in this color and between two / are from the operator of the German mirror site and translator/.

Copyright Dr. Eng. Jan Pająk

The use of moral mechanisms for prevention of cataclysmic earthquakes

Part #G: How God implements earthquakes and all other cataclysms:

#G1. The "standard procedure" for a cataclysm:

At the beginning of this web page, in item #A1., is emphasized that the Bible is unambiguous - if someone leads the life of a “wrongdoer” (wicked person), then he or she will be killed because of this. In turn on several different web pages, e.g. on the one named Bible, the finding of totalizm was emphasized, that the Bible contains commands and requirements of God explaining "how people must lead their lives", and that this commands and requirements are NOT negotiable - if someone does NOT obey them, then is going to bear consequences. For this reasons, all so-called "group intellects" - means nations, cities, or communities, which refuse to lead their lives in the manner currently called "moral" (i.e. agreeable with requirements of God), are treated with cataclysms which kill these "wrongdoers" and which correct the morality of such "group intellects".

Item #A2.6. from the web page named Totalizm explains the finding of the totalizm, that the complete and balanced picture of reality is obtained only if this reality is researched from two approaches simultaneously, namely from the approach called "a posteriori" (i.e. "from effect to cause") and approach called "a priori" (i.e. "from cause to effect").

Unfortunately, the jealously guarding its "monopole for knowledge" present "atheistic orthodox science" researches the reality from just one approach called "a posteriori" (i.e. "from effect to cause"). In turn for such an approach, this science sees only a "half of reality", and thus e.g. is unable to indicate any effective method of defence against cataclysms. On the other hand, when the author of this web page analysed already accumulated by him attributes of cataclysms presented, amongst others, in part #P. of this web page (and also presented on the entire web pages Day 26 and Landslips, in items #H2. to #H4. of the web page Tapanui and also in item #B1. of the web page named Prophecies), then from these cataclysms emerged very clear regularities. Such regularities, after being processed from an opposite philosophical approach called "a priori" (i.e. "from cause to effect"), indicate several relatively easy methods of defence against cataclysms. Unfortunately, the same "atheistic orthodox science" has reasons (e.g. the danger of loosing its "monopole for knowledge") to block the dissemination of knowledge about these methods of defence. After all, if it turns out that really works a method of defence against cataclysms which I developed, then this would mean that also correct and working are all other ideas which I developed, and which dissemination the official science blocks since around a quarter of century, because they invalidate correctness of the foundations of present atheistic science - i.e. such ideas as my Concept of Dipolar Gravity, Totalizm, Timevehicle, Oscillatory Chamber, etc.

Therefore, this atheistic science is going to do everything in its power to hold back the verification of any amongst these methods. However, taking under the account the present desperate situation of the humanity with cataclysms, in the vivid interest of endangered cities and communities lies saving themselves with the use of every already developed method of defence, even if the atheistic orthodox science to-date has towards this method some irrational prejudices and intends to NOT allow to disseminate it amongst people. According to the principle explained in item #F1. of the web page Totalizm and stating that truth is the source of progress, even if it is unpleasant, this duty of "trying" of self-defence extends also to methods of defence which are described on this web page.

The theory of everything called the Concept of Dipolar Gravity explains to us that God is simply a huge, self-aware, natural program (for details see item #C2. on the totaliztic web page God proof, or item #I2. on the totaliztic web page Dipolar gravity). In turn being a program, God likes to develop "standard procedures of action" for almost everything that He does. (Examples of a number of such "standard procedures" of God's action, including also a procedure of creating subsequent races of people, are described in items #D1., #D2., and #D3. of the totaliztic web page Newzealand visit).

Probably for this reason, if the leading of "immoral"lives by "group intellects" forces God to "punish" these intellects with a cataclysm, then God also sends this cataclysm according to a "standard procedure of punishing immoral communities with a cataclysm". In a best manner this "standard procedure of bringing a cataclysm" is described in verses from 18:20 to 19:28 of the Biblical "Book of Genesis" - at an occasion of the discussing in there the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, and then later is illustrated with numerous examples of immoral cities already punished by God - for summary of legends about destructions of such cities see items #H2. to #H4. of the web page named Tapanui or item #B1. of the web page named Prophecies.

My analyses to-date of the cataclysms to descriptions of which I had an access, reveal the essence of several most frequently repeated stages, in the typically implemented by God "standard procedure of serving a cataclysm". In turn our learning, to what God pays the greatest attention in each one amongst these stages, allows us to develop effective methods of self-defence against cataclysms.

Here are stages which seem to be repeated most frequently in cataclysms already known to me which I had opportunity to analyse so-far:
(1) Warning reminder of "what" and "how" is punished by God.
(2) Checking the "complaints" of people arriving to a given city, means checking whether a high number of complaints of outside witnesses about behaviours of the inhabitants of a given city, qualifies this city to receive a God's punishment.
(3) "Clarification of reasons" for which this cataclysm is send to a given community.
(4) "Warning" a given city (or community) that a cataclysm is going to be send to it - if its inhabitants do NOT change their behaviours and philosophy into more "moral", and giving a chance to them to defend and to protect themselves.
(5) Checking whether the required "change" of behaviours and philosophy really took place. The inhabitants of city selected for a cataclysm are tested whether they can document, that they really changed their behaviours and philosophy.
(6) Counting and removing the "righteous" people from the area selected for a destruction, and preparation of manners of saving these ones who deserve to be saved. This stage is aimed at making sure that these people, who do NOT deserve the punishment from God, are protected (see the "Book of Genesis", verses 19:12-22).
(7) "Sending the cataclysm" (see "Book of Genesis", verses 19:24-28). In cases when there is a real chance that a given city (or community) still can change their behaviour into a more moral, then the destructive cataclysm is served in at least 3 increasingly powerful steps, after each one of which is repeated the completion of all stages (1) to (7) described above, and is also provided a time required for the change of behaviours and philosophy that this city (or community) practices. And so, firstly is served
(7a) the "warning cataclysm" which destroys property, but usually do NOT kill people. If after it still the change of behaviours and philosophy does NOT take place, and still a given city or community continues old ways and practicing the Parasitism, then God serves
(7b) the "urging cataclysm" which is to remind that there is about the time to change the philosophy and behaviours. This one destroys properties, but also kills a lot of people. If also after this "urging cataclysm" neither the philosophy nor behaviours do NOT display the required change, then God serves
(7c) the final "annihilating cataclysm". After that one the entire city (or a given community) is completely wiped out from surface of the Earth. So it ceases to be suitable for further inhabiting. After the wiping out this city (or community) from the surface of Earth, still left are after it various remains which later are serving as
(8) the "moral lesson for further generations of people". Let us now discuss briefly the most vital attributes of each one amongst the above steps.

Re. (1): The warning explanation "what" and "how" is punishable. This function is performed by an event induced intentionally by God, which reminds to inhabitants of a given city or community, that they must obey commandments of God. In turn the commandments which people must obey, for the last 2000 years are clearly explained in Bible and in various religions, while lately are also recommended by the Philosophy of Totalizm with the use of modern language and scientific notations. Of course, practically the entire Bible explains "what" and "how" is punished by God. In addition to this, there are parts and verses in it which clearly emphasize these most severaly punished behaviours. For example, in the "Book of Deuteronomy", verses 27:15-26, is provided a lengthy list of "God's curse on anyone who...". In turn the verse 18:22 from the "Book of Leviticus" reminds us - quote: "No man is to have sexual relations with another man". Verse 30:1 from the "Book of Ecclesiasticus" (note - do NOT confuse it with the different "Book of Ecclesiastes") states - quote:
"Whoever loves his son will beat him frequently so that in after years the son may be his comfort." (For more details on the subject of commanded by God way of disciplining the youth - see item #B5.1. from the web page Free will.)

Me personally fascinates the immense intelligence and skilfulness with which verses 18:23-32 from the Biblical "Book of Genesis" warn these readers who know how to read them, while simultaneously pretend to be "old stories told by shepherds" for atheists and for internally biased readers. If someone reads these verses, then is stricken by these six repetitions of assurance that the city is NOT going to be destroyed for decreasingly lower number of "righteous" people. These repetitions capture and hold the attention of less careful and inquisitive believer, to realise to him or to her, that if he or she lives in the area where also live a noticeable number of especially morally acting people (i.e. "righteous"), then should NOT wary - because he or she is safe.

After all, God clearly promises in the Bible which He authorises, that He never is going to punish and to destroy an area inhabited by a significant number of "righteous" people. In addition these verses emphasize, that the smallest number of such especially moral people, which still is able to prevent a given settlement from the "God's punishment", is ten righteous. Thus, if someone wishes to be reassured, whether a given area is safe from the "God's punishment" - in spite that a large proportion of its inhabitants does NOT behave morally, then he or she should count, whether really knows at least "ten righteous" people living locally. But it is important to take notice of the exact meaning of the word "righteous" which is used in the Bible, and thus not count wrongly for these "10 righteous" some 10 people who are NOT "righteous". After all, a "righteous" is a person who not only just listens to his or her voice of conscience, who lives morally, and who is a moral role-model for others, but someone who in addition to all these attributes also is doing a work which boils down to the judging and categorising of other people - means someone who works actively with the community, who polarises, attracts and groups around himself or herself other morally acting people, who exerts a moral influence on others, etc. So the "righteous" must NOT be confused with the "religious" people - after all, as the most recent religious scandals emphasize this, someone can be highly "religious", but he or she is still practicing the punishable by God philosophy of parasitism.

In spite of such significant role that these repetitions of verses from the Bible play for believers, for ordinary readers and for atheists the same repetitions of verses serve to an opposite purpose - namely for the intentional discouraging. Thus, e.g. for atheists the repetitions prevent the content of these verses from being taken seriously and from being analysed carefully. (After all, God always follows the action of "moral field" and act accordingly to the so-called "canon of ambiguity" described in item #C2 from the totaliztic web page Free will.)

But if someone has the so-called "moral skeleton", and because of it treats these verses seriously as a "message from God", then he or she discovers in them two vital facts. The first of these is that in verses 18:27-32 they do NOT refer to Sodom any more, but refer to any "city" in the world. In turn the second fact is that they are so skilfully formulated, that they express everything in the future tense. In other words, these verses actually contain warnings and explanations which God gives to all communities and to all cities of the world, and which extend their validity to all times to come.

Re. (2): The checking of "complaints" of people that arrived to a given city. If a city (or a community) practices the punished by God Philosophy of Parasitism, then the manifestation of this practicing always is that almost all strangers arriving to that city, "complain" later on the treatment that they received in there. For example, inhabitants of that city (or community) form a kind of arrogant "gang" which recognises only "their own" while looks down to all others, which makes miserable life to all outsiders, which is snobby, jealous, greedy, and shares nothing with others, which do NOT known what is compassion, helping, politeness, etc., etc. Of course, in such a city (or community) outsiders feel bad and "complain" later about the treatment which meets them in there. Thus God emphasizes in the Bible that "complains" of outsiders are the triggers and the cause of undertaking "punishing procedures" towards a given city (or community). For example, for Sodom and Gomorrah such "complains" are emphasized in the Biblical "Book of Genesis", verse 18:20, while in case of the city Nineveh in the "Book of Jonah", verses 1:2 and 3:2. Then the same "complaints" are also the reflection what outside world thought about a given city (or community), and thus how in the future this city is to be presented in the "moral lesson for future generations of people".

Of course, God sees perfectly well the level of morality of this city from the "implosions" and "explosions" of its moral energy. But for people such "implosions" and "explosions" remain invisible. After all, the "moral energy" itself remains invisible to the human sight. But God created this energy and sees its flow. Thus, for God areas in which people practice massively the philosophy of parasitism look like kinds of volcanoes that dissipate moral energy. In this way God can easily notice and select these areas on the Earth, which because of the massive practicing of parasitic philosophy already reached the level of "agonal intellect" and thus demand some sort of catastrophe to be send to them by God. But the problem is, that about immoral behaviours of inhabitants of a given area must learn also outside witnesses from other areas. After all, only then a given punishment serves to next generation as a "moral lesson". In order punishments could serve as such "moral lessons", it is necessary that people from outside areas previously "complained" vividly about the city being punished. For this reason the number of "complains" of outsiders becomes a "trigger" which releases the sending of the "God's punishment" to a given city.

The Bible also informs (see "Genesis", verses 18:20-21 and 19:1-11), that in addition to visual scanning the level of advancement of philosophy of parasitism in a given area, before sending a disaster God always sends in there His "bodily representations" so that these could in person experience the treatment that inhabitants of a given area serve to visiting people. (What are these "bodily representations of God", is explained in "Re. (3)" from item #D1. of the totaliztic web page Newzealand visit.) If the community from that area in fact proves its parasitic habits, then the decision about the catastrophe is finally confirmed.

Knowing that "complains" of outsiders bring a cataclysm, it is possible to develop a "crisis method of cataclysm prevention" which is based on the elimination of such complaints. Although such a method "heals symptoms, not the illness", in a crisis situation it can be used to temporally delay the cataclysm.

Ad. (3): The clarification of reasons. Because God's punishments are actually "moral lessons" which later must serve people for a long time as moral guidelines to correct behaviours, before God initiates a "punishment procedure" towards a city, He firstly clarifies exactly "for what" a given punishment is served. For this clarification, in old days God used various strangers send to a given city, to experience in there various forms of persecutions, bad treatment, chasing by dogs, etc., and then brought news about these treatments to the rest of the world - for details see e.g. verse 19:5 from the Biblical "Book of Genesis", or see e.g. item #H4. from the web page named Tapanui.

In present times these clarifications of reasons (i.e. complains of people badly treated) are contained in newspaper articles, television news, in descriptions on internet web pages and blogs, etc., etc. - although still most frequently they originate from visitors to a given city. After all, the most reliable indicator of someone's morality is how this someone treats strangers, emigrants, older people, weaker then oneself, etc. - means all these who do NOT belong to "old boys club", "system", "ours", nor to the group of "former colleagues from the same school".

Ad. (4): Warning. Every city (or community) punished by God is always firstly "warned" that they are going to be punished. Furthermore, it obtains various chances to be able to defend or protect from the incoming punishment. The warning typically contains also the explanation "for what" a given punishment is served - and contains a condition that "if a given city (or community) does NOT change its ways and philosophy". About the fact that God really requires the change of philosophy practiced by a given city, clearly certify attributes of a "change" that is acceptable to God, described in the Biblical history of the city "Nineveh" - see the Bible, "Book of Jonah", verses 3:1-10. For examples of manners on which in old days such "warnings" were delivered, it is worth to see item #B1. on the web page named Prophecies, or items #H2. and #H4. of the web page Tapanui.

Of course, in present times we have newspapers, radio, television, internet, telephones, etc. So today these warnings may take e.g. a form of statement published in the media - as an example see item #C4. from the web page named Seismograph, or see the article "Kaumatua's earthquake prophecy will come true ... eventually", from page A1 of New Zealand newspaper The Dominion Post - discussed in 8 from item #I3. of the web page Day 26, or see item #G2. on the web page Prophecies.

The chance given by God to every city (or community), to be able to defend or protect from the incoming cataclysm, has a "self-regulatory" character. It is illustrated and explained in the best manner in item #I1. of this web page, on the example of New Zealand. A long time before New Zealand was affected by earthquakes from Christchurch, it received a model of a device for remote detection of impending earthquakes shown below in Img.020 (#M1), and it also received an expertise in the form of my knowledge and creative capabilities, which allowed to build working prototypes of this device and to use these prototypes for alarming of inhabitants of Christchurch (and other cities of New Zealand) that an earthquake is just approaching.

The human lack of knowledge about "warnings" that cataclysms are coming, typically result from the fact that God makes sure only that they take a form that is accessible to everyone interested (i.e. that everyone who is going to be killed or ruined in the result of given cataclysms, could earlier learn that they are coming - of course only if wants to know this). In turn familiarising oneself with these "warnings" God leaves to the "free will" and choice of every interested person. So in order to learn about just such a "warning", it is NOT enough to passively lie on "one's back" and to await for someone to yell it to our ears - as this is done by present politicians and salesmen. According to the action of the "moral field" the "warnings from God" one must seek actively - typically in places which officially are ignored, but which have a long tradition of honest confirming the truth. After all, it lies in the personal interest of everyone, that due to early learning of such warning, one can undertake a self-defence against given cataclysms. In turn when cataclysms already come, one cannot self-defend against their destructive power with the help of typical today excuse "I was NOT warned about them".

Ad. (5): Checking whether the required change of philosophy and behaviours took place. Before a cataclysm is served, firstly takes place a check whether previous moves of God, e.g. warnings or earlier treatments, already provided the intended effect, while a given city (or community) actually changes its behaviour and philosophy onto the required "more moral". If inhabitants of that city are able to prove to other people (amongst others to those ones who previously complained about them), that they really changed their ways into more "moral", then the cataclysm is called off. In the "Book of Jonah" from the Bible, verses 3:1-10, is provided a clear confirmation, that if inhabitants of a given city let other people somehow know clearly that they changed their ways and philosophy, then the cataclysm is called off.

Re. (6): Counting and removing the "righteous" people out from the area, and preparation of manners of saving these innocent people that deserve to be saved. The counting of "righteous" results from the promise of God discussed in "Re. (1)" above, that the city in which lives permanently at least 10 such "righteous" will NOT be destroyed. Thus just before sending a cataclysm, God makes sure, that the number of "righteous" is already in there below the required number of 10, and then God takes out of the city all of them. Also, in practically every cataclysm there are people who avoid it due to a previous guiding that they received, or by some miraculous "coincidence". Although typically they are just "ordinary" people who cannot be described by the definition of "righteous", still most frequently they are more moral from others, and also in their further life usually turns out that God had for them some vital mission to fulfil. In spite that such "coincidences" which save them from a cataclysm, can always be explained atheistically as just "random events", actually when one considers them, they turn out to be this "leading 'moral' and 'innocent' people out of the area affected by a given catastrophe". (Notice that "coincidences" really are "unexplained", as the "atheistic orthodox science" to-date still does NOT know "what" or "who" rules over such "coincidences" with intelligent consequences.) To be honest, even myself I had several cases in my life, when my life was saved just by such a "random coincidence" (an example of this my personal "coincidence" is described in item #77 from subsection W4. of volume 18 in monograph [1/5], while briefly it is mentioned in item #M3. of the web page Telekinetic Battery, and also in item #H2. of the totaliztic web page God proof.)

Re. (7): Sending the cataclysm. If a given community is to be punished with a catastrophe, then the moment of time and circumstances when the catastrophe is to hit, are carefully planned. For example, the date of it is frequently so designed, that for people who are sensitive to hidden messages, religious reasons for serving it are emphasized. These cities (and communities) about which God and other people already received confirmations, that for sure they are NOT changing their philosophies, are destroyed fast with a single deadly cataclysms. A recent example of just such a cataclysm is the Indonesian province "Bandar Aceh" described on the web page Day 26. But these cities and communities, which still display a potential for changing their philosophies, typically are "punished" in three steps, served with a growing force. Examples of such "three steps" in punishing cataclysms are indicated in item #M1.2. from the web page Telekinetics. Let us discuss now these three steps:

Ad. (7a): The "warning cataclysm". This one is send at the very beginning as a kind of "warning", and simultaneously "test for morality" and the illustration of the power of "nature". It demonstratively destroys properties, but either does NOT take lives at all, or just kills symbolically a small number of people. After it, a period of time comes, in which the endangering with a cataclysm hangs above heads of punished people, but they receive a chance to document that they changed their philosophy. If necessary, such a "warning cataclysm" is repeated several times. But if in the result of it a change of philosophy and morality does NOT happen, then served is incomparably more destructive "urging cataclysm".

Ad. (7b): The "urging cataclysm". This one destroys NOT only a lot of properties, but also takes lives of a significant number of people. From analyses to-date seems to appear, that in case of cities it typically destroys around a half of their infrastructure (i.e. houses, streets, water and electricity supply, plumbing, etc.), and kills enough people to make every inhabitant of the city to feel a mourning after someone he or she used to know in person. After that "urging cataclysm" God typically allows the inhabitants to rebuild the city, but He watches whether in the effect of this rebuilding the morality and philosophy of the inhabitants experienced the required improvement. However, if the city does NOT prove that it experienced a significant change in morality and in philosophy, then after the rebuilding is finished, the final "annihilating cataclysm" is served which erases that city from the maps.

Ad. (7c): The "annihilating cataclysm. This one completely wipes out a given city or community from the surface of the Earth, so that it ceases to be suitable for further inhabitancy by people, and thus it disappears from maps of the world. But as it seems from already occurring cases, usually appears a significant time-gap between an "urging cataclysm" and that final "annihilating cataclysm". This gap looks-like a kind of "verification spread in time" whether destructions caused by the "urging cataclysm" actually induced the required change of philosophy. For example, just so happened with Pompeii. Firstly destroyed was in it around a half of buildings of Pompeii, then God gave to it around 16 years of time and peace - so that inhabitants were allowed to rebuild it. But when it turned out that these destructions and the effort of rebuilding did NOT cause the required change in morality and philosophy, in 16 years later Pompeii was "erased from maps" with this "annihilating cataclysm" in the form of Vesuvius eruption. Another similar case was the city of Salamis in Cyprus - described in item #H3. of the web page named Tapanui.

It was firstly half-destroyed by a war. But when it rebuild, yet the immorality and decadency of its inhabitants did NOT change, it was wiped out completely from the surface of the Earth by as many as three tsunamis arriving in short time gaps. So if someone would extrapolate those fates of Pompeii and Salamis to present times, then probably would find as many as several cities described, amongst others, on this web page and on pages related to it (e.g. on pages Tornado, Katrina, Landslips or Day 26), which further fates would be worth to carefully watch now in order to see whether after finishing their rebuilding from "urging cataclysms" that they received, these morally most incorrigible amongst them will also be wiped out from maps of the world.

Ad. (8): A moral lesson for next generations. In order the future generations have guidelines and examples for moral lives, the history and consequences of a given cataclysm are then documented in the form of legends, historic descriptions, material remains of the city being destroyed, etc., etc. Examples of just such documentations are described in items #H2 to #H4 from the web page named Tapanui.

#G2. How these at least three (3) main manners on which God "camouflages" (hides) the true mechanisms of formation of earthquakes and all other cataclysms (in order to NOT deprive people of their "free will"), prove to us that every cataclysm is extremely carefully planned and implemented by God:

God implements every cataclysm in so carefully planned and wise manner, that there are embedded into it at least three (3) sets of attributes which document simultaneously at least three different causes and mechanisms of that Act of God. Therefore, depending on the philosophy and views of the person which explains the appearance of a given cataclysm, the origins of it can be explained at least: either as (1) induced accidentally by the "stupid and blind nature", or as (2) induced intentionally by "simulations" of the hostile towards people creatures which I myself call "evil UFOnauts" in my research, or as (3) induced on purpose by God in order to correct the morality of people living in a given area.

In turn, when the character of a given cataclysm allows to explain it also as caused by, or dependent on, human activities, and when people actually do carry out immoral activities which display cause-effect link to a given cataclysm, then God additionally embeds into it the fourth set of attributes - explained in item #C2 from the web page named Tornado. Namely, in such cases evidence also appears which suggests, that a given cataclysm was (4) caused by immoral activities of people. An example of cataclysms, which in fact contained evidence that they supposedly were caused by explosions of nuclear bombs (i.e. by people), was that highly destructive earthquake and tsunami, which affected Japan on Friday, 11 March 2011, and which were described more thoroughly, amongst others, in items #C7. and #I1. of a separate totaliztic web page named Seismograph, and in items #M1. to #M1.3. from yet another web page named Telekinetics.

A relatively extensive body of evidence which suggested origins of that Japanese tragedy from nuclear explosions, in 2011 was circulated in internet. At that time examples of it was possible to find, amongst others, via www.google.pl and eclinik.wordpress.com. A very similar evidence about a different earthquake in Washington DC, supposedly also induced by nuclear explosions (i.e. about the earthquake described more extensively in item #C8. from the web page named Seismograph), in 2011 was available, amongst others, on the web page in the section /1007/616/Washington_Quake_Was_Nuclear_Explosion.html, and also at google.pl/search?q=washington+nuclear+bomb, and in davidsj.com/pictures/nuke-earthquake.gif /not found/.

In turn completely different example of almost a world-wide cataclysm, which also included evidence that suggested its origins from immoral activities of people, is described in items #J1. and #K1. from the totaliztic web page named Plague.

This discovery of the new "totaliztic science", that God embeds into every cataclysm simultaneously at least three (3) different sets of attributes, realises to people a number of immensely vital facts, which previously were NOT understood by the humanity at all. For example,
(a) it proves that every cataclysm is prepared by God extremely carefully - and thus that there must exist very vital reasons for which it is implemented (such as the necessity to "correct the morality of a given 'group intellect' "). It also
(b) realises, that an exact course of every cataclysm is planned in advance to a smallest detail - thus e.g. the fact "who" and "how" is to be saved from this cataclysm is also planned in advance. What really vital,
(c), it proves and confirms beyond any doubt, that cataclysms are NOT implemented by the "stupid and blind nature" (as this is claimed by the old "atheistic orthodox science"), but by immensely intelligent and omnipotent God (as this is scientifically documented by the new "totaliztic science"). After all, "stupid and blind nature" would NOT be able to embed into every cataclysm these at least three sets of attributes simultaneously. In turn from the criminology we know, that even the most intelligent human criminals have difficulties with embedding into their crime this "second" set of attributes which would "set up" into a given crime someone completely innocent. Also in case of attempts of such "embedding the second set of attributes" by human criminals, usually even ordinary policemen are able fast recognise this.

However, the fact of embedding by God into every cataclysm these at least three (3) sets of attributes, for almost two thousands of years remained undetected by even the most genius human scientists! In turn thus proving and confirming, that cataclysms are planned by intelligent and omnipotent God, reveals also that
(d) there are ways for convincing God, to delay or to abandon the sending of a cataclysm onto a given "group intellect" (i.e. onto a given community) or convincing God to save a given person from the incoming cataclysm. This in turn means, that implementing cataclysms by God allows to develop "methods of effective defence" of the kind described in items #A2., #C2., and #H1. to #M1. of this web page.
The existence of these at least three sets of equally valid attributes embedded into every cataclysm, which attributes allow to explain every cataclysm at least at three (3) equally valid manners, is discussed from various points of view on a number of totaliztic web pages. Thus readers can find their descriptions e.g. in item #C2. of the web page named Tornado or in item #J1. of the web page named Plague.

= > #H.
Visitors since 15.12.22: (english sites)