< = back | = > Day 26 (overview) < =

Blue links lead to the fully translated html versions of the page, purple links lead to pages whose start pages (as well as introductions and tables of contents at least) are already set up, green links lead to extern sites, grey means that no file is available yet).

/Notes in this color and between two / are from the operator of the German mirror site and translator/.

Copyright Dr. Eng. Jan PajÄ…k

Secrets of deadly tsunamis: people can prevent them

Part #R: The problem of parasitic imitations of "help" which actually destroy instead of helping:

#R1: It is better to NOT help at all, then in a parasitic way imitate "helping":

When a destructive catastrophe hits a given community, then all people rush to "help". On the other hand, both this web page, as well as item #B4. of the web page Seismograph, indicate unambiguously, that all "catastrophes" in reality are intentionally caused by God just in order to help these communities in ceasing their practices of the Philosophy of Parasitism. Therefore a "help" of others, in the majority of cases, instead of actually supporting the intentions of God in ceasing to practice parasitism by the community hit by this catastrophe, in reality acts against the intentions of God and pushes this community in even deeper parasitism. In other words, the majority of present forms of "help", instead of helping, in fact destroys. Therefore, if any help is issued to someone treated with a catastrophe, then it is extremely vital that this "help" fulfils a range of very strict requirements of the totaliztic help - described in subsection JD11.3. from volume 7 of my newest monograph [1/5].

Unfortunately, a decisive majority of "helpers" knows about "helping" approximately the same as typical present mothers - means it considers that e.g. a "help" is to "give" and to "do for someone" which encourage the helped person to lie back and to wait until others do everything for him or her. In the result, instead of really helping, typical present helpers offer a parasitic imitations of "help" which in reality only destroys more the helped community. Therefore, if we do NOT have a guarantee that the "help" which we are giving to someone just affected by a catastrophe, really fulfils requirements of the "totaliztic help", then it is much better is we do NOT help at all, then if we help in a destructive (i.e. in the parasitic) manner - as this took place e.g. during the earthquake from Haiti on 13 January 2010 (see the descriptions from item #C3 of the web page "Seismograph") or e.g. during the hurricane Katrina.

#R2. Distinguishing between the parasitic imitation of helping and the real totaliztic help:

The philosophy called Totalizm quite unambiguously defines how we should act in everything that we do in our lives - in this number also (and especially) during providing help to victims of some catastrophe. Namely, every our action must be so carried out that all people affected by it always are lifted uphill in so-called "moral field" (means that it goes along the so-called "line of highest intellectual resistance"), means that in every person affected by it the amount of so-called "moral energy" is increased. How exactly we should carry out all our actions so that they fulfil this totaliztic requirement, is comprehensively described in volume 1 of the monograph [8/2]. So I am NOT going to repeat this here. Only in order to realise what is the essence of such "totaliztic help", and how it differs from the "parasitic harming under the excuse of helping", I remind here an old Korean proverb which excellently expresses this essence. This proverb states: "if you give a fish to someone, you will feed him for a day - but if you teach him how to fish then you will feed him for a lifetime".

In other words, if after a catastrophe someone starts to give away food, tents, clothing, medicines, money etc., giving them at random to either individual victims, or to local caciques and chieftains, then he or she in fact is carrying out the parasitic imitation of "helping". After all, in such a case these gifts do NOT get to people who need them the most, but e.g. to the ones who have the most of brut force to get to the top of queue. Also the people who did NOT received such gifts are discriminated in relationship to the ones who appear at the moment of giving and who gets such gifts. Therefore, such a "giving" makes more damage than good. After all, it makes gainers dependable on the giver as well as on the arrival of further help, it promotes uneven treatment and discrimination of some victims, it allows changing of help into a way of benefiting local caciques and chieftains, it encourages robberies and receiving without putting into any work, it deprives the initiative and own ingenuity in victims of the catastrophe, it chains victims to the area of catastrophe etc.

#R3. Examples of totalizticforms of help which we should try to give to victims of catastrophes, and examples of parasitic imitations of "help" the continuation of which we should avoid:

From the general principle of providing totaliztic help described before, stems unambiguously how we should help victims of a catastrophe. And so, it is extremely vital that the giving of help is so organised that every victim of a catastrophe has the same chances to benefit from it. So instead of selectively to individual people, or to local caciques and chieftains, the "totaliztic help" should be directed to the entire community affected by the catastrophe. For example, instead of giving away food to individual people or to local caciques and chieftains, the totaliztic help would organise "kitchens with restaurants" which would issue one-time meals to every hungry person who would come in person. Instead of giving away tents or building houses to individual people - such help would erect kinds of large communal "shelters" in which every homeless could safely shelter (but which would NOT deprive the motivations to rebuild with own hands previous own homes or to go into the world to find new place and to start a new life). Instead of giving away medicines - it would organise "hospitals" in which every sick or injured would be healed. Instead of giving money to local corrupted authorities, the helper would organise on the spot public works towards rebuilding roads, communication facilities, and public transport, so that victims of a catastrophe could find work and fast rebuild their lives etc.

Interestingly, principles of such "totaliztic help" are thoroughly outlined in the Bible - for example see the biblical recommendation to "feed a hungry" (e.g. see the Biblical "Book of Psalms", 25:21), "heal these sick" (e.g. see "Luke", 10:9), "homeless temporally shelter" (e.g. see the "Wisdom of Sirach" (Ecclesiasticus), 29:20-21) etc. (Notice, however, that the Bible does NOT commands to give a bag of grain to a hungry, to give medicines and bandages to a sick, or to build a house to a homeless or to give him a pocket of money.) Thus the only difference between recommendations of the Bible and the statements of totalizm about principles of providing help, boils down to the fact that ancient ideas used in the Bible allow to explain "what" but do NOT have yet words required to explain "why". In turn present scientific terminology of totalizm (such as "moral field", "moral energy", or "moral laws") allow already to explain both "what" and "why".

= > #S.

Visitors since 15.12.22: (english sites)