Blue links lead to the fully translated html versions of the page, purple links lead to pages whose start pages (as well as introductions and tables of contents at least) are already set up, green links lead to extern sites, grey means that no file is available yet).
/Notes in this color and between two / are from the operator of the German mirror site and translator/.
A13. The evolution of knowledge and views of God and its reflection in next religions of the world
Everyone who learns more than one religion, easily is going to notice, that all religions of the world state precisely the same "truths". In other words, all religions of the world describe exactly the same process of shaping our world and the reality in which we live, the creation of man, as well as precisely the same requirements of human living in the surrounding reality. So even a rough analysis of statements of subsequent religions reveals, that all religions of the world must have exactly the same author, and that the author of these religions must be one and always the same supernatural being, who knew absolutely everything about our world (means it must be one and always the same God). On the same principle as experienced teachers always are able to determine correctly that the author of a whole group of homework essays was one and the same student, we currently are also able to determine conclusively, that the author of all religions of the world was one and always the same God. This in turn proves unambiguously a whole array of absolute "truths". For example, it proves that in spite of denials of science, God does exist. It proves that there is just one God. It also proves, that in spite various religions use different names for their God, and also in spite that in descriptions of this God the religions use various examples, situations, and terminology, still all of them describe the only existing God and one and the same process of creation of the world and man by that single God.
Item #C2. of the web page named Truth indicated links and references to examples of very extensive scientific evidence which certifies that God does exist, and thus that our physical world was created and is ruled by this God. In order to save the reader from seeking these references and examples, below in this item I am going to present still another example of just such evidence. This example indicates unambiguously the existence of God, and it additionally indicates that all the religions of the world state exactly the same truth, means that all religions of the world must have one and always the same supernatural author which must be the only existing God. The example described in this item indicates also, that even if given religions originated from areas which were isolated from the rest of the world, such as e.g. New Zealand, and even if they were formed in ages which differ by several thousands years from each other, still they state exactly the same. In turn such consistent likeness of statements of all religions of the world, does NOT have any other explanation apart from the fact, that the author of all these religions is always the same supernatural creature, means always the same and the only existing God.
Of course, present atheistic scientists do NOT have the courage to admit that the "close similarity (almost identity) in statements of all religions of the world in fact confirms that all religions of the world are authorised by one and always the same God" - as it is empirically proven in further part of this item. Therefore these atheistic scientists try to find some imagined arguments to contradict this fact. When we discuss with them we can be sure that they are going to tell us that e.g. "the close similarity statements of all religions results from the principle on which works human mind", or that e.g. the "close similarity of statements of all religions results from similar environmental conditions in which all humans live". Fortunately it is NOT difficult to prove the basic error of such atheistic argumentation. This is because we do have on the Earth another structures, which are very similar to religions, but which in their entirety were invented by people. These structures very similar to "religions" are "political systems". A "political system" of every country is like a separate "religion". The government of every country is like the institution of church in a given separate religion. In turn principles and doctrines that formulate this political system are like principles and doctrines of a religion. For example, a political principle that "every unemployed has a right to receive an unemployment benefit" is an equivalent to a religious principle that "every believer has the right to earn entry to heavens". In turn the political principle that "the good of many outweighs the good of a few" (understood as an opposite to the political principle that "the good of a few important or rich people outweighs the good of the rest of society") is equivalent to a religious principle that "God invented and created people" (as an opposite to the claims of atheists that "people created-invented God").
So if really the mutual similarities of all religions are caused by people, NOT by the God's authorship of all religions, then "political systems" of all countries also should say exactly the same - e.g. that "every unemployed from each country deserves an unemployment benefit (dole)", or that e.g. "in all countries the good of many should outweigh the good of a few". However, if one looks at different political systems invented by people, then e.g. "the unemployment benefit (dole)" only in a few sparse countries of the world is granted to practically all unemployed people (e.g. it is so in Australia). There are countries, e.g. New Zealand, in which the unemployment benefit is granted to only around 32% unemployed - means to less than every third unemployed (for details see the article "Ease rules on dole for couples say economists" from newspaper The New Zealand Herald, Monday, June 29, 2009, page A1). We also know, that there are countries, e.g. Zimbabwe, in which none unemployed receives a dole. Similarly is with the political doctrine that "the good of many outweighs the good of a few". This doctrine was practiced in a few sparse countries of the world. For example, in years 1982 to 1984 I was delighted to enjoy this doctrine in New Zealand ruled then by probably the best leader which this country ever had (and surely the best leader I ever knew), i.e. ruled by the late Sir Robert Muldoon (1921-1992). But when in 1984 the party of Sir Robert Maldoon lost the elections, in the same New Zealand this doctrine was replaced by an exact opposite of it, i.e. by the political doctrine that "the good of a few influential and rich people is outweighing the good of many citizens". This new doctrine is practiced in New Zealand until today.
This is because of it, that in New Zealand a referendum needed to be carried out on 1 to 20 August 2009, to persuade the government to withdraw the law that the government imposed onto the nation. The referendum asked citizens: "Should a smack as part of good parental correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand?" - for details of this referendum see item #B5.1. from the totaliztic web page Free will. To summarise this paragraph, the huge diversity of statements of political systems created by people - but displaying a significant analogy with religions, conclusively proves that the "close similarity in statements of all religions of the world in fact confirms that these religions are authorised by one and always the same God".
In item #J5. of totaliztic web page Wszewilki it was indicated, that learning the reality around us can be compared to a climbing upwards of a vertical and smooth wall. For as long as there is NO scientific theory created which described and explains this reality, the climbing is practically almost impossible. After all, the climber has NO tool nor support which would facilitate his efforts. But when such a descriptive theory is created, then it works like a ladder or a scaffold attached to this wall. The climber can now support on this theory in his efforts to learn.
For as long as the theory of everything called the Concept of Dipolar Gravity was NOT created yet, the human analyses of subsequent religions did NOT make any sense. After all, these religions used different names and terminologies, were based on different examples, and explained matters from different points of view. But when finally the Concept of Dipolar Gravity (and the philosophy of totalizm which stems from it), explained to us precisely almost all basic matters related to God, for example explained what God really is, how God evolved, what are three basic components of God, what are principles of moral behaviour which God passes to people with the aid of religions that this God established, etc., then rapidly it turned out that all religions in the world make a perfect sense, and that all of them say the same truths. It also turned out, that all religions in the world use an ancient terminology with various examples and comparisons to pass to people exactly the same messages as with the modern language of science explains to us this Concept of Dipolar Gravity and the philosophy of totalizm. In order to document here this perfect correspondence of statements of the Concept of Dipolar Gravity and all religions of the world, below I am going to explain in subsequent items all key attributes of God that result from this concept and from the philosophy of totalizm inspired by it. Then I will prove on the existing evidence, that exactly the same attributes of God are in various ways described also in practically all religions of the world. Because the discussion of all religions of the world would exceed the humble size of this web page, I am going to analyse below only three most representative religions of the world, namely (1) "Christianity" - which is the most well known religion to all people, (2) "Hinduism" - which is the oldest religion of the world, and (3) the religion of ancient Greeks - which is the most scoffed at by present people. (Because ancient Romans practiced exactly the same religion (3) as ancient Greeks did, only that they changed into their own all names of Gods used in it, the analysis below describes simultaneously the religion of ancient Romans. In a similar manner it describes also the old religion of New Zealand Maoris - as it is explained near the end of this item.) So here is this presentation of exact correspondence between key attributes of God in examples of religions of the world analysed here:
1. The "Holy Trinity" - means the three basic components of God. The Concept of Dipolar Gravity explains to us that God in fact is a kind of a "natural computer", which is composed from three basic components, namely from: (1) "hardware" which is a kind of eternally existing "thinking liquid" called the "counter-matter", (2) "software" which naturally self-evolved in this "liquid hardware", means a kind of gigantic natural "program of God", and (3) "peripherals" means our physical world (and people) which this natural "program of God" forms in a software way from the "counter-matter". More comprehensive descriptions of these three main components of God are provided on several web pages of totalizm, e.g. in items #C2. to #C4. of the web page God proof, in item #B1. and #B5. to #B7. of the web page Evolution, in item #B5. of the web page God, and in item #C1. of the web page Soul proof.
As it turns out, exactly the same three basic components of God are explained by practically every religion in the world. This is because practically every religion in the world describes the so-called "Holy Trinity", as the three major components of God which at the beginning of times clarified themselves from the "chaos" of the initial universe. In a best way we know this "Holy Trinity" from the "Christianity". And so, (1) the "hardware" component of the "Holy Trinity" in the Christianity most frequently is called the "God Father". But in the Bible also other names are used, e.g. the "Ancient of Days" - see Daniel 7:9, 7:13, and 7:22. In turn, (2) the "software" component of the "Holy Trinity" in the Christianity is called the "Holy Ghost". Finally, (3) the "peripheral" component of the "Holy Trinity" in the Christianity is called the "Son of God" - while symbolically it is represented by Jesus (who actually represents all people and the entire physical world).
In "Hinduism" God also is composed from the "Holy Trinity". Only that otherwise than in Christianity, Hinduism described the major function (not the nature) of subsequent components of God. And so, (1) the "hardware" component of the only God in Hinduism is called "Brahma" - means the "Creator". After all, it is from this "hardware" that formed is practically everything that fills up the entire universe. Furthermore, it was in this hardware that the "software" component of God evolved naturally. In turn, (2) the "software" component of God, in Hinduism is called "Vishnu" (or "Krishna") - means the "preserver". After all, these are programs of this "preserver" that maintain states and action of the universe. Finally (3) the "peripheral" component of the only God in Hinduism is called "Siva - means the "destroyer". After all, in the physical world everything is subjected to a destruction pretty fast.
No many people are aware, that the same "Holy Trinity" was described also by the religions of ancient Greeks and Romans - which were very similar to each other. Only that in these two religions the descriptions concentrate on explaining the mechanism of beginnings of God and the universe. Also, these two religions do not use the name "Holy Trinity". The component (1) "hardware" of this "Holy Trinity" from the religion of ancient Greeks was called "Tartarus" - because it was located in the same area as the "world of dead" (i.e. the "counter-world") - which emerged first from the initial "Chaos". The component (2) "software" ancient Greeks called "Eros" means "love". It is interesting that the world "love" for ancient people represented perfectly the abstract qualities which presently we call "programs" or "software" or "algorithms", and which in the Biblical Evangel of St. John 1:1-10 is called with the terminology "word" (in the meaning of "information" or "program"). Finally (3) the "peripheral" component of the "Holy Trinity" in the religion of ancient Greeks was called "Gaia" or "Ge" - means the "earth". After all, it represented the "matter" from our physical world.
2. The existence in the universe of just a single superior being (i.e. just a single God) which, however, can manifest itself to people in many different manners. The Concept of Dipolar Gravity explains to us, that in spite of being composed from as many as three separate components, God is a single superior creature - similarly as a computer is a single device in spite that it is composed of (1) "hardware", (2) "software", and (3) "peripherals". A similar message is also stated by all religions of the world. Unfortunately, in Christianity the individual name for this single God, which has three components, at the moment seems to be lost or non-used for political reasons. (In spite of the warning provided in the biblical Revelation, 22:18-19, that - quote "I warn everyone who hears the prophetic words in this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, and if anyone takes away from the words in this prophetic book, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city described in this book.", still the Bible turns out to be the most altered book of the world - see also item #C4. from the web page named Bible) But in old Bibles the individual name for God was stated as "Yahweh" - still present in various older translations of the Bible, see in there verses from Psalms 83:18 or Exodus 6:3. (The name "Yahweh" for the whole God, stems from so called Hebrew tetragrammaton "YHWH" and usually is translated as the "True God".) In Hinduism, this single only God is called "Brahman". In turn, in religions of the ancient Greece and Rome the individual name for this single God also seemed to be lost or non-used - like it happens in present Christianity. But this God had a general name of "Holiness" - as it represented a common element which was present in all carriers of this "Holiness", means in all ancient "Gods". Furthermore, this only God had the individual name "Io" in the old religion of New Zealand Maoris - whose religion was almost identical to that of ancient Greece and Rome.
3. The omnipresence of God and His ability to do billions of things at the same time. The Concept of Dipolar Gravity explains to us, that otherwise than it is with people, who are able to do just a single thing at a time, God is able to carry out billions of activities simultaneously. This His extraordinary ability God accomplished due the formation of His hardware and software composition into the shape of a natural "multiprocessor computer". It means, that similarly as people can be compared to PCs with just single "microprocessors" (i.e. with a single "Intel"), God is like a "supercomputer" which has billions of "processors" working in parallel. Each one amongst these billions of "processors" is able to carry out actions independently from others, although all of them have the same awareness, knowledge, memory, etc. Thus God is able to do billions of actions at once. Such an omni- powerful capability of God is confirmed in practically all religions of the world.
Because of its simplified descriptions and brief Bible, the "Christianity" does NOT explain "how" and "why" God is able to carry out these billions of activities at the same time. Therefore the Christianity is satisfied with informing faithful, that God is omnipresent and omnipotent, and that it sees and does everything at once.
Extremely precise "Holy Scriptures" of Hinduism explain this capability of God quite thoroughly. They reveal that God, while is just a single being, in fact has many "personalities" called "deities". (Today such "deities" we would explain as the "simulated" by God "biological composites". These "composites" are formed through combining together human-looking bodies - which God temporarily creates for the duration of completing a given interaction with humans. To each body God links directly His own mind, thus passing to it, amongst others, the selected "personality" which is characteristic to this specific "deity". On the same principle as in past God created these "deities", presently God temporarily "simulates" "UFOnauts", while not long ago God simulated "devils" and "angels" - for more information see item #D2. on the totaliztic web page UFO, or item #J2. on the totaliztic web page Aliens.) Each one of these personalities is able to carry out own actions and take own decisions independently from others, although each one of them shares the knowledge and awareness of the entire only God.
The religion of the ancient Greeks this ability of the God to carry out many activities at once explains through the introduction of many independent "gods", however each one of which is characterised by the "Holiness" common to all of them. In turn these "gods" are simply different names to creatures temporary "simulated" by God, which in Hinduism are called "deities" and which were already described in the previous paragraph.
4. The existence of afterlife. "Why" people have the afterlife, by the Concept of Dipolar Gravity is explained in item #C3. of the totaliztic web page Soul proof. This existence of afterlife stems from the fact, that one amongst three components of every person, is a kind of immortal natural "program" popularly called a "soul". As it turns out, the fact of existence of afterlife is explained to people by practically all religions of the world (although the logic states that if the authors of these religions were completely different beings - instead of a single and always the same God, then NOT all religions should inform about the existence of afterlife).
5. The moral requirements imposed onto the physical life of people. All religions
impose onto people exactly the same moral requirements. For example, all of them forbid killing, lying, cheating, etc. But rarely religions explains "why" these commandments were introduced. Explanations "why" provides to us only the “philosophy of totalizm” - due to revealing that on the intellectual level in the universe active are three quantities, called the "moral field", the "moral energy", and the "moral laws" (see also item #A2. on the web page Truth).
***
Extremely intriguing for me personally is the old religion of New Zealand Maoris (I.e. the religion which was practiced by Maoris before they adopted the Christianity around 1840.) Maoris inhabit remote islands which since the beginning of times were cut off from contacts with the rest of the world. Therefore, if the real authors of their religion would be they themselves, then this religion should be drastically different from all other religions of the world. But in reality the old religion of Maoris is almost an exact copy of the religion of ancient Greeks and Romans. Only that Maoris used their own names for subsequent personalities of God (i.e. for their "gods"). For example, what in the religion of Greeks was called the initial "Chaos" of the early universe, Maoris called "Po". Their Greek-like "Holy Trinity" Maoris called: (1) "Rangi" (i.e. "sky") - for the "hardware" component (described by them as "male"), (2) "Tane" (i.e. the "creator of the world") - for the "software" component (also described as "male"), and (3) "Papa" (i.e. "earth") - for the "peripheral" component (described by them as "female"). Maoris had even their own equivalent to the Greek "Heracles" (means the Roman "Hercules") - which for Maoris was a giant called "Maui". The interesting part of Maori mythology was that "Tane" is presented as a son of "Rangi" and "Papa". But the defining "Tane" as a son of "Rangi" does NOT run against of what the totaliztic web page named “evolution.htm” states in item #B1. After all, an easiest manner of explaining to ancient Maoris, that the "software" component of "Holy Trinity" self-evolved in the "hardware" component of the same "Holy Trinity", was to tell these Maoris that "Tane" is the son of "Rangi". In a similar manner, the explanation to old Maoris of the content of item #C3. from the web page named God proof - namely that a significant proportion of the "software" component of God originates from natural programs that form the physical world, was most easy by telling these Maoris that "Tane" is also a son of "Papa". In the book [1#C6] by Margaret Orbell, entitled "Maori Myth and Legend" (Canterbury University Press, 1995, ISBN 0-908812-45-0), on page 179 is described how, according to the Maori Mythology, "Tane" created the first woman. (Selected information on the subject of creation of this first Maori woman is also provided in item #D3. of the totaliztic web page Newzealand visit.)
And so, he firstly shaped the body of a woman from "sand" of Hawaiki (the name "Hawaiki" refers to the Maori version of "Eden"), and then he “breathed life into her mouth” so that she become alive. This is why she was called "Hine-ahu-one" meaning "The-woman-shaped-from-soil". Via this first woman Tane gave also to people various problems, like sweat, tears, sneezing, coughing, mucus, etc. This description has NOT only a perfect correspondence to the descriptions of the creation of a first human contained in all religions of the world, but also corresponds well to what on this subject states the Concept of Dipolar Gravity in item #D2 of the web page named “soul_proof.htm”. After creating the first woman Tane had many children with her, thus forming the Maori race.
What even more intriguing, the old religion of Maoris still contained elements which in the religions of Greeks and Romans were watered down or forgotten with the elapse of time. For example, in spite a huge variety of godly personalities-manifestations known under various names, Maoris acknowledged the existence of just a single true God, which they called "Io". This only God of Maoris "Io" was almost an exact copy of the only God "Brahman" in Hinduism. Furthermore, the old religion of Maoris cultivated extremely precise information about how from "Po" - means from the initial "Chaos" of the universe, the "Holy Trinity" evolved. For example, they knew as many as 12 different phases of the evolution of "Po" into "Tane". Interestingly, some amongst these phases generated states which currently the Concept of Dipolar Gravity describes as characteristic and necessary for the evolutionary self-shaping of the software component of God. For example, from this "Po" emerged, amongst others: "Te Hinengaro" means "mind, desire", "Te Manako" means "longing", "Te Tipuranga" means "growth", "Te Mahara" means "thought, memory", etc. As so-far I have NOT met any estimates of the age of Maoris' religion. But because the same religion was widely distributed amongst a number of nations from islands of Pacific, probably it is as old as the religion of ancient Greeks and Romans. All the above confirms again that the author of religion of Maoris must be God Himself, and that in times of passing this religion to Maoris God had a characteristic for that period template of the religious knowledge which people should learn, as well as the unique method of passing this knowledge.
***
The above examples indicate unanimously, that the author of all religions of the world is always the same single superior being of the universe. Only that this single being created subsequent religions in significant time gaps from each other. For example, the creation of the oldest religion of the world, i.e. "Hinduism", took place around 6000 years ago, i.e. almost immediately after God created the physical world and people - see explanations from subsection JA1.3 in volume 6 of monograph [8/2]. Means, "Hinduism" was created around 2000 years before the creation of the religion of ancient Greeks, around 4000 years before the creation of "Christianity". (As well as around 6000 years before inspiring the Concept of Dipolar Gravity and totalizm.) Therefore, during the creation of subsequent religions, this single superior being (God) had increasingly more experience and knowledge as how to pass knowledge to people and how to convince them. Thus, in subsequent religions this superior being could repair His previous errors. For example, the error of "Hinduism" was to give to people too detailed information - means too voluminous "Holy Scriptures" which in addition were written with too precise language, and thus which no-one amongst people was able to read in their entirety nor understand them fully. Therefore, during the creation of the religion of ancient Greeks (and Romans and Maoris), God did NOT gave them any "Holy Scripture" at all - although this also later turned out to be an error. After all, the lack of written rules caused that to the religion of Greeks and Romans gradually continuous changes creped in, and these religions started to deviate from the original messages of God. Therefore, during the creation of "Christianity" God decided to give a very short "Holy Book" in form of the Bible. This Bible used rather simple and non-precise everyday language that was understandable even for ancient shepherds. But with the elapse of time, this simplicity of the language of Bible caused mistakes in interpretations, which God was again forced to correct somehow (amongst others through inspiring the creation of scientific theory of everything called the Concept of Dipolar Gravity, and the philosophy of totalizm which stems from this theory).