I5.2.1. A formal scientific proof that "people have eternally existing soul"
#1
© Dr. Eng. Jan Pająk


I5.2.1. A formal scientific proof which confirms that "people have eternally existing soul", formulated according to principles of mathematical logic
Motto: "The differentiation of mischievous spitting and sarcastic scoffing at an idea under the excuse that it is just a criticism of that idea, from a true constructive criticism of that idea, is simple: mischievous spitting raises points which can be raised about any possible idea and against any possible person; in turn a constructive criticism concentrates exclusively on matters which relate directly to the subject that this criticism concerns and therefore which do not apply for any other idea, person, or matter. So just by simple checking whether someone's objections can be applied to all other ideas as well, or just to this one, you immediately know whether the criticizer is just trying to be mischievous and smart, or really have valid points to make."


In 2007, during my professorship at a university in South Korea, I had a special honor, and simultaneously a special responsibility, to develop, to publish, and to disseminate four formal proofs, each one of which is extremely important both, individually to each one of us, and collectively to the entire our civilization. One of these is the formal proof presented below for the existence of eternal soul in each person. This proof is just a component in a series of several similar formal proofs already listed and described in subsection I1.4.2 /?/ from this volume of the monograph. In the descriptions that follow a full version of the formal proof, that each one of us have an eternally existing soul, is presented. But before I formulate this proof, a few more words of this introduction.
The formal scientific proof for the existence of eternal soul in each person, was developed in initial days of October 2007, when I was on my professorship at a university in Southern Korea. This proof was carried out with methods of mathematical logic. Differently that it was with three other proofs indicated before in this item - which are based on commonly known assertions (facts) already established by present science, the proof for the existence of eternal soul is based on findings of relatively new scientific theory called the Concept of Dipolar Gravity, a second part of which is presented in this volume. Namely, it is based on the finding, that we people are composites of three separate components. These components include: (1) our physical body - which the Concept of Dipolar Gravity compares to a picture formed on a screen of present computer and perceived by our software senses; (2) our counter-body formed from eternally existing counter-matter (by religions this counter-body is called "spirit"), and (3) our "soul" which is a kind of hierarchically most superior natural program that makes us to be individual people - this program is the carrier of our self- awareness, memory, personality, etc. These three components of us were described more comprehensively in the previous subsection I5.2, as well as in subsection I1.4.1 /?/ of this volume. So here it is, the entire formal proof for the existence of eternal soul in each person, completed with the use of methods of mathematical logic:
Theorem:
"People have eternally existing souls.
Basis propositions:
(1) Phenomena of self-awareness, memory, personality, etc., which represent human

soul, can manifest themselves only if these have either the software coding (i.e. are a kind of natural program written on a carrier of some sort), or have the hardware coding (i.e. are "hardwired" in some area of human body or human brain). The fact that present medicine cannot find such special volume of human body or brain, the removal of which would cause also the removal of these attributes that represent human soul, eliminates completely the possibility that these attributes are "hardwired" permanently into some parts of our body or brain.
(2) The software coding which carries the human soul is either coded into the physical body - and thus this coding is destroyed together with the destruction of the physical body, or the software coding which carries the human soul is coded into the counter-body formed from the eternally existing counter-matter that resides in the counter-world - and thus this coding is surviving infinitively long after the physical death of the human's body. The existence of a whole range of phenomena observed empirically by people, such as e.g. experiencing by some people the separation of their conscience from the body and the visiting different rooms of a hospital by this conscience during difficult operations, double or triple personalities which are able to compete for one and the same body, memory recalls by some people of various details of previous incarnation, remembering events which took place a long time before our birth, near-death experience (NDE), and many other, exclude completely the possibility that attributes which represent human soul are coded into our physical body and are destroyed together with this physical body.
(Explanation complementing this 2nd set of premises: from the operation of present computers it is know already, that software never wears nor tears and that it exists forever - to the destruction can only be subjected the carrier on which programs are stored. This fact is confirmed and emphasized already by almost every modern textbook of "Software Engineering". Because the carrier of natural programs of our souls is the eternally existing counter-matter, which itself never is subjected to destruction, the obvious consequence of this must be, amongst others, that programs of our souls stored in this counter-matter exist forever and are never subjected to destruction.

(3) People either have eternally existing soul that is coded in a software manner in their counter-bodies formed from the counter-matter, or they do NOT have this soul. The fact that it can be proven that the software coding of this soul is stored in the eternally existing counter- matter and is able to survive the physical death of the body, eliminates completely the possibility that people do NOT have such eternally existing soul.
Proof:
(1) The first basis proposition is to be transformed with the use of tautological form of

the method known under the name of "disjunctive syllogism". This form can be written as [(p || q) && !p] => q, in which the assertion "p" says "phenomena of self-awareness, memory, personality, etc., which represent human soul can manifest themselves if these have the hardware coding (i.e. are 'hardwired' in some area of human body or human brain)", while the assertion "q" says "phenomena of self-awareness, memory, personality, etc., which represent human soul can manifest themselves if these have the software coding (i.e. are kinds of natural programs written on a carrier of some sort)". In turn the assertion "!p" states "the fact that present medicine cannot find such special volume of human body or brain, the removal of which would cause also the removal of these attributes that represent human soul, eliminates completely the possibility that these attributes are "hardwired" permanently into some parts of our body or brain." The transformation of these propositions leads to the conclusion that "phenomena of self-awareness, memory, personality, etc., which represent human soul, have the software coding (i.e. are kinds of natural programs written on a carrier of some sort)."
(2) Accepting this previous conclusion for an assertion in the next phase of inference, and using the method of "disjunctive syllogism", the tautological form of which can be written as: [(p || q) && !p] => q, we obtain a next conclusion which states that "software coding which carries the human soul is coded into the counter-body formed from the eternally existing counter-matter that resides in the counter-world - and thus this coding is surviving infinitively long after the physical death of the human's body."
(3) The last couple of propositions allows us to derive the final conclusion also with the method called the "disjunctive syllogism", the tautological form of which can be written as: [(p || q) && !p] => q. In this form the assertion "p" says "people do NOT have eternally existing soul that is coded in a software manner in their counter-bodies formed from the counter-matter", while assertion "q" states "people do have eternally existing soul that is coded in a software manner in their counter-bodies formed from the counter-matter". In turn the assertion "!p" states "The fact that it can be proven that the software coding of this soul is stored in the eternally existing counter-matter and is able to survive the physical death of the body, eliminates completely the possibility that people do NOT have such eternally existing soul." Thus the final conclusion states "people do have eternally existing souls written in a software manner into their counter-body that is formed from counter-matter."
Conclusion:
The above inference chain unambiguously and conclusively proves the truth of the theorem that "people do have eternally existing souls written in a software manner into their counter-body that is formed from counter-matter".

***
For the use of these readers who are NOT familiar with the notation that is applied in
the above proof, I would like to explain that symbols "p", "q", and "r" mark subsequent "assertions" utilized in this proof as logical variables. In turn symbols "!", "&&", "||", and "=>" mark logical operators "not", "and", "inclusive or", and "implies" (if ... => then ...").
It is also worth to emphasize again the validity of the above proof. Because this proof utilizes exclusively tautological forms of subsequent methods, it remains valid for all values of variables it uses. Thus practically it is error-proof. If someone would like to undermine it, he or she would need to undermine first the validity of mathematical logic. In turn this logic is a foundation for countless mathematical proofs which with a large success were used by the effective and precise discipline of mathematics. Thus, since so strong proof for the existence of eternal soul in people we finally were able to develop, it introduces for us huge implications.

Because of the existence of this proof, and also three further proofs mentioned at the beginning of this item, it becomes really important that everyone of us verifies his or hers attitude towards God, other world, moral life, etc., etc. After all, without the verification of this attitude, we may inflict ourselves the biggest harm that one is able to inflict on himself or on herself.
Especially vital in the above proof is that it is a component of several very similar by methods used, but different by evidence that they utilize, formal proofs that coexist in this series of monographs. These formal proofs in fact formulate the foundation stones for the entirely new scientific discipline about another world, God, act of creation, soul, etc. In order to illustratively realize here to the reader the weight of the appearance of as many as four such proofs simultaneously, it would be good to compare ourselves to old time Maoris that inhabited New Zealand and that had no idea of the existence of farm animals, such as horses or cows. (Before first Europeans arrived to New Zealand, these islands were inhabited mainly by birds and by lizards.) So when these Maoris saw the first horse, probably they suspected that it is just a mirage or a freak of nature. When they saw two horses, they started to be puzzled and convinced that some new quality is just entering their lives. When they saw three horses, they could be absolutely sure that horses do exist and that they need to take notice of them. In turn when they saw four horses, they needed to revise completely their view of the world that surrounded them. (By the way, now Maoris are biggest appreciators of horses and they cannot live without these animals.)
At this point I would like to appeal to other lecturers of logic. Namely, as this is suggested also in other proofs related to this one, instead of using in our lectures some examples of proofs deprived of actuality and sense, we should rather use examples of proofs selected from four extremely important proofs explained in this item. After all, these proofs are to inspire students to thinking and to searches for truth, give more sense to their lives, will be agreeable with indications of our conscience, and in a non-imposing manner are going to add our own contribution to the fight for the prevalence of truth.

=> I5.3.
Antworten to top



Gehe zu:


Benutzer, die gerade dieses Thema anschauen: 1 Gast/Gäste