H10. Let us balance our knowledge through learning the governed by God world...
#1
© Dr. Eng. Jan Pająk

H10. Let us balance our knowledge through learning the governed by God world of "totaliztic science", and comparing it with the atheistic world of old "orthodox science"
Motto: "The one-sided monopole of the 'atheistic orthodox science' to-date, makes the humanity poorer, divided, senseless and gloomy to the level which we see today around us. So it is about the time to restore the richness, harmony, sense and excitement of living on the Earth, by abolishing this monopole with the competitive development of new 'totaliztic science'."
 

As this is already explained in the previous parts of this chapter, the new Concept of Dipolar Gravity reveals that parallel to our "physical world", there is another "counter-world". This whole new world impatiently awaits to be scientifically investigated. It is filled up with a new type of substance, that previously was unknown to human science, and also is governed by new types of laws, which still remain unknown to our scientists. For example, such properties of the counter-matter as the ability to think, or such laws of the counter-world as the moral laws, were never investigated before. Also, numerous completely new phenomena and laws were discovered, which the science to-date was unable to identify, but which introduce a potential for wide technical utilizations. Simultaneously, these properties of the counter-matter, and these new laws that govern counter-world, are exerting a huge influence on the physical world. This influence manifest itself in countless manners, for example physically through the existence of instant telekinetic motion, telepathic messages, elapse of time, and other similar phenomena, while intellectually through the operation of moral laws, the existence of moral energy, moral polarity of all events, existence of the universal intellect, etc.
Therefore, now when we finally managed to discover counter-mater and the counter- world, and when we realized the influence they have on our lives, there is a necessity to open completely new "totaliztic science" which on one hand would introduce a competition to the complacent "atheistic orthodox science" to-date, while on other hand would assume the duty of systematic researching these new horizons. Let us start this subsection from the clear explaining, that there are enormous differences between this newly-emerging "totaliztic science" and the old "atheistic orthodox science" to-date. These differences cause, that a given researcher can work in only one of these two sciences. Moreover, we need to clarify here, that these two sciences will be "competing" with each other - after all, they both research two completely different sides in the same reality which surrounds us. Of course, such their competitiveness, is to turn blissful for our civilisation. After all, as probably readers know this from either own life experiences, or from the science of economics, every "monopole" – including into this the "monopole for knowledge" of the "atheistic orthodox science" to-date, is extremely immoral and destructive for everyone. For example, it decreases the quality and efficiency of work and research, it suppresses the criticism and thus obstructs the revealing of truth, it leads to deviations, fashions, taboos (i.e. forbidden areas which are NOT allowed to be researched), it promotes immoral behaviours (e.g. oppression, destruction, aggression), it corrupts, demoralises, and degenerates work force and decision makers, it escalates prices, it deepens the laziness, subdivides into classes and categories, etc., etc. 
The empirical life continually confirms to us, that "passing the same path, but in both opposite directions, always is the source of two different sets of knowledge which mutually complement and extend each other". For example, if we stand on the top of a mountain, while our eyes catch images (light) arriving from the bottom of it, then our view is different than when we stand on the bottom of this mountain while our eyes catch the view (light) arriving from the top of it. But only the thorough watch in both these directions provides us with a full understanding of the entire situation with that mountain. In addition, watching from each one out of these two directions, we see further details which remained hidden while we looked from an opposite direction, but which extend our knowledge about the mountain. Similarly, if we look at the landscape through one end of a telescope or binoculars, then whatever we see is to differ drastically from what we are to find out when looking at the same landscape through the opposite end of the same telescope or binoculars. But only combining together our findings from both these directions of looking, provides us with a full and balanced knowledge of work of these instruments. The same happens even if we e.g. just walk or drive "to", and then "from" a place - our road in both directions also provides us with a different knowledge, in spite that it is passing through exactly the same trajectory (e.g. the road "from" always subjectively "feels" as "shorter" and as if we pass it "faster" than the road "to", also during the road "from" we capture additional details of the "other side" which we missed during the road "to" because they remained hidden and invisible to us). At outlets of some rivers tourists and locals are entertained by extraordinarily condensed "super-waves" that run "against the current", means "from the sea" - as this is described in item #D2 of the web page named "dipolar_gravity.htm". But only seeing also the unusual "extended" waves that run "with the flow" on fast rivers, reveal to us that these "super-waves" are outcomes of collision between the motion of wave and motion of water - and that this collision causes their "condensing". Similarly, seeing the so-called "red shift" in the light of stars that is "condensed" due to run "against the gravity current" of heavy stars, only induces wild speculations of some under- educated scientists regarding "where this red colour of light comes from". Only seeing also the "blue shift" in the light coming from the blue sky and "extended" by motion "with the gravity current" of the Earth, reveals to some rational thinking people that "the gravity is a dynamic dipolar field" similar to a field formed by the air at the entry to a fan. To summarise the above, if one wants to gain a full and balanced knowledge about consequences of a given "pathway", then it is necessary to experience this pathway in both directions.
In spite of these empirical findings that "only travelling in both directions provides us with the full and balanced knowledge", in every matter people insist on going in only one direction. As an example of that insisting, let us consider the "road to God". In medieval times, the religion looked at everything by "starting from God and extrapolating this onto the surrounding reality", while it "burned on stake" every person which tried to accumulate an atheistic knowledge. In turn present-day "atheistic science" does exact opposite, namely it "looks at everything starting from the surrounding reality and extrapolating this onto God", while it "burns on the stake" everyone who (like my "totaliztic science") tries to show the world from the prospective of God. Unfortunately, due to limiting its investigations to just this one approach, the science to-date arrives to the erroneous conclusion that "God does NOT exist". However, the empiric experience reveals to us, that in order to gain the "complete and balanced knowledge" it is necessary to learn about the surrounding reality (and about God), by passing the "road to knowledge" in both these directions, i.e. by "placing ourselves in the situation of God and extrapolating our analyses at the surrounding reality" as well as by "atheistic researching the reality which surrounds us and extrapolation our findings onto God". In this way, these two approaches mutually are to check and to complement each other. In order to realise here the benefits open for us due to such "two-directional" approach, let us briefly compare accomplishments of the monopole of the atheistic orthodox science to-date - means present official human science which "researches only the surrounding reality while the results tries to extrapolate onto God", with the rich competitiveness of the newly born totaliztic science - means the new science which is based on the philosophy of totalizm, and which "analyses everything after placing itself in the position of God and extrapolating God's prospective onto the surrounding reality".
As I am documenting this with countless evidence in a whole range of totaliztic publications, for example in item #B1 from the web page named "changelings.htm", or in next subsection H10.1 from this monograph, such "world ruled by God" that results from research of the "totaliztic science" must drastically differ from the "world without God" that stems from the research of the "atheistic orthodox science". For example, in the "world without God" finding "bones of dinosaurs" must mean that dinosaurs in fact lived on the Earth. In turn in the "world governed by God" finding "bones of dinosaurs" means only that God has some superior goal in showing these bones to people - as this is described in items #A1 and #E1 of the web page named "evolution.htm". Thus God could "create" these "bones of dinosaurs" in the same way as He created people and created animals - in spite that dinosaurs did NOT need to live on the Earth. In a similar way in the "world without God" there is no place for "morality" nor "dreams", nor even for the "higher feelings" like love, pity, sorrow, etc. In other words, in order the humanity accomplished the balanced picture of the universe, reality must be simultaneously researched and interpreted by two competitive sciences, namely by the to-date "atheistic orthodox science" and by the "totaliztic science" which is just being established by the philosophy of totalizm. In turn results of both these sciences should be taught simultaneously in schools and officially disseminated amongst people. This is because without such a parallel learning from both these "roads to knowledge", the picture of the universe is highly "biased", deviated, and poor.
As I already explained it at the beginning of this item, the competitive approach of the new "totaliztic science" is NOT entirely new in every its aspect. After all, it represents the approach to research of the reality, which by past philosophers was called a priori - means "from cause to effect". In a highly limited edition it was practiced in past by religions, while in the ancient times it was even used by Jewish scholars - who preserve the essence of it until today in the form of "kabala". But the "totaliztic science" introduces several new (highly creative) components to this old approach. For example, it states that the use in scientific research exclusively one approach, i.e. the use exclusively either "a priori" approach, or exclusively "a posteriori" approach (i.e. the one which climbs "from effect to cause" - means the one which is exclusively used by present "atheistic orthodox science") is a serious epistemological error which leads to deviations in the human knowledge. This is because, in order the knowledge is complete and balanced, it is necessary to use both these approaches simultaneously. In other words, in vital interest of the humanity lies the establishing and running on the Earth as many as two competitive sciences simultaneously, i.e. the continuation of to-date "atheistic orthodox science" with its exclusively "a posteriori" approach to research, and the simultaneous establishing and running a new "totaliztic science" which would be based on the Concept of Dipolar Gravity and on the formal scientific proof for the existence of God - thus which would scientifically develop the "a priori" approach to the same research - as this "a priori" approach is represented and illustrated already now in this my monograph. Of course, many more such new and highly creative elements were introduced to the "totaliztic science" - only that their full description (and illustration on examples) requires rather voluminous publication, such as presentations spread over the entire volume of this monograph.
Sadly, the monopole of "atheistic orthodox science" is surely going to disallow for a long time to come, both - the official establishing and financing of the "totaliztic science", as well as the official dissemination of findings of that "totaliztic science". After all, the "atheistic orthodox science", similarly like every other monopolistic institution, gains significant financial benefits and complacent life due to its "monopole on knowledge" - which benefits it does NOT want to share voluntarily with anyone, while which complacent life it does NOT want to loose by creating a competition. Thus, for a long time to come the totaliztic researchers, similarly like Dr Jan Pająk - the author of this monograph, will be forced to research the universe as "unemployed scientists", and perhaps some of them will be even skilfully deprived the right for an "unemployment benefit" - thus experiencing another manifestation of the "curse of inventors" described in item #B4.4 of the web page named "mozajski_uk.htm". Because of this vicious obstructing the free and official disclosure of the findings of the "totaliztic science", to balance own knowledge every person should try to learn these findings in his or her private capacity. After all, when starting from the point of view that "God exists", and being aware of the method of God according to which "God always provides evidence in support of whatever people strongly believe and are prepared to act on" (this method of God is described in subsection A16 of this monograph, and also in item #A2.2 of the web page named "totalizm.htm"), rapidly the world around us begins to look differently. For example, everything that surrounds us begins to be just a kind of "hologram" formed by God to accomplish His superior goals - e.g. to inspire people for creative searches and to improve "morality". Thus, for example looking at "skeletons of dinosaurs" we start to know that these skeletons do NOT mean at all that dinosaurs actually lived on the Earth - but only mean that God wishes to inspire human creative searchers by "fabricating" them. Similarly, e.g. the so- called "red shift of lights from stars" and "expansion of the universe", do NOT certify at all for the "big bang", but certify for the high complexity and refinement of the laws of nature which God encoded into the software of the universe - as this is explained in item #D2 of the web page named "dipolar_gravity.htm". In turn, when we realise all these, our lives again become enriched with the deep sense of purpose and with the understanding of direction - both of which the humanity lost recently because of the "biased" deformation of the knowledge due to the complacent "monopole" of the present "atheistic orthodox science".


***
The above explanations present one amongst most key motivations and approaches to
research advocated by the philosophy of totalizm. As such these are also discussed in item #A2.6 of the web page named "totalizm.htm" which summarises most vital ideas which constitute the philosophy of totalizm.

=> H10.1.
Antworten to top



Gehe zu:


Benutzer, die gerade dieses Thema anschauen: 1 Gast/Gäste