H5.2. What is magnetic field
© Dr. Eng. Jan Pająk

H5.2. What is magnetic field
Motto: "A magnetic field is a circulating stream of counter-matter".

It is unfortunate, to say the least, that human science at the beginning of the third millennium still was not able to answer the simple question: "what magnetic field actually is?". The highest authorities in magnetism, when confronted with this question, simply "put their heads into the sand" and evade the issue by providing a highly-abstract definition, which describes the effects, not the causes, of magnetic field. It seems that the medieval monks' explanation of magnetism as a "sort of holy phantom which emerges from one end of a bar magnet and disappears into the other end" remains the explanation of this phenomenon that is closer to the truth than the explanations of modern scientists of 21 century.
The formation of the Concept of Dipolar Gravity finally provides the answer to the question "what magnetic field actually is?", as well as explaining the principles of the formation of this field. Below is given a more detailed explanation of this phenomenon that results from this concept.
It was experimentally determined that all electrically charged particles, such as electrons, protons, positrons, etc., are spinning like tops. One of the presentations of recent discoveries in this matter is contained in an article [1H5.2] by Alan D. Krisch, "Collisions between Spinning Protons", published in "SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN", August 1987, pp. 32-40. Because each of the spinning particles is contra-balanced in the counter-world by a corresponding cluster of spinning counter-matter, the rotation of this particle must also cause a circulation of counter-matter surrounding this cluster. This circulation of counter-matter could be compared to the formation of a miniature whirlwind by a child's toy - a "spinning top" - after setting it in rotation. As a result, micro-whirls of counter-matter must accompany every electrically charged particle. In normal circumstances the axes of rotation for these billions of micro-swirls take chaotic orientations, therefore their actions mutually cancel one another's effects. For this reason in stationary charges the swirling of counter-matter can be detected only on a micro-scale. The situation changes drastically when the particles are forced to flow. During movement they orient their axes of rotation in the direction of the flow of currents. Having parallel axes of spinning, the particles now accumulate their effects on counter-matter. Such an accumulation can be compared to the effect of hundreds of "spinning tops" swirling simultaneously in one room so that their miniature whirlwinds, reinforcing one another, cause the air in the room to rotate. The result is that the flow of electric charges orders their axes of rotation and thus form the large-scale circulations of counter-matter known to us by the name of "magnetic field".
To summarize the above in the form of definition we can say that a "magnetic field is a circulating stream of counter-matter which cruises along closed circuits and thus forms gradients of pressure (i.e. circuits which form local compressions and dispersions of the counter-matter)". This means that the force lines of magnetic field are in fact the drift lines of circulating counter-matter.
Counter-matter is a substance permeating that other world inaccessible from our set dimensions - see subsections H2 and H3. Therefore the circulation of counter-matter is undetectable for our instruments, but it interacts with other similar circulating streams of this substance. So it behaves exactly like magnetic field does.
When the electric current flows along a straight wire, counter-matter swirls around this wire forming a vortex magnetic field (i.e. a field having indistinguishable N (I) and S (O) poles, because it rolls around a given wire). But when electric charges take on a circular flow, as observed in coils of electromagnets, or within the atoms at electrons' orbits, then the counter- matter is "pumped" through the clearance of this closed circle, in a similar manner as air is pumped through the face of a spinning fan. In this manner a dipolar magnetic field (i.e. field having clear "inlet (I)" and "outlet (O)", means N and S poles) is formed. In this field pole N represents the "inlet (I)" for the circulation of counter-matter (i.e. like an inlet side of a fan), while S pole represents the "outlet (O)" from which the counter-matter is blown out (i.e. like a back side of a spinning fan). Notice that the notation of polarity of magnets used here is opposite than in physics (but similar as in cartography).
The model of formation of magnetic field presented above, allows for a simple explanation of all the known phenomena connected with magnetism. For example, magnetization (or production of permanent magnets) is the process of putting into order the axes of the particles' rotation, by means of the action of the external stream of circulating counter-matter. (So it is a process that is the reverse of the formation of a field by the flow of charges). When analysing any other magnetism-related phenomena we must inevitably reach the conclusion that the model presented above is the correct one and that it should be commonly accepted as soon as possible.
It is much easier to comprehend properties of magnetic fields and polarity of magnets, when the circulation of the counter-matter is imagined as the circulation of air. In such an analogy, one coil of an electromagnet can be visualized as a propeller of an aircraft forcing the surrounding air to circulate. The front side of such a propeller would be an "inlet (I)" pole, or "N", while the rear side of a propeller would be an "outlet (O)" pole, or "S". The analogy for a bar magnet would be a kind of "pipe" formed from billions of little propellers (each single atom would be one such a miniature propeller). To obtain the simulation of the interaction between two magnets, it is sufficient to consider the relative interaction between two streams of air circulated in that way. Of course, when applying the above analogy we should remember that counter-matter, unlike the air, possesses no mass, no viscosity, and does not create friction. Therefore all the attributes of a circulating stream of air which result from the above properties of this medium (i.e. from mass, viscosity, or friction) do not appear in magnetic fields.
The above should be complemented with an information, that whatever our present science knows under the name "magnetic field" is always a circulation of counter-matter, which causes local compression or dispersion of this substance. Therefore the statement is valid, that all magnetic fields that are detectable to our science, are resulting only from such movements of counter-matter, that always create gradients of pressure of this substance. Also only to them relate the Maxwell's equations.
But there are also other kinds of motions of the counter-matter, which do not form detectable gradient of pressure. An example of these would be the flow of counter-matter through physical objects that move in relationship to this substance. Such gradientless "winds" of counter-matter are not detectable for present science. They also do not obey the Maxwell's equation. But from the definition they are also kinds of "magnetic field". Various parasciences call them "scalar magnetic fields". As it turns out, these gradientless movements of counter- matter have a vital significance for many phenomena discussed in this series of monographs, e.g. for telekinesis, telepathy, radiesthesia, etc. For this reason the Concept of Dipolar Gravity, and also the totaliztic sciences of counter-world discussed in subsection H10, must put in the future a high attention to their thorough research.
There is a wealth of evidence originating from areas other than physical magnetism, which additionally confirms the correctness of the counter-matter-based explanation for magnetism. Let us review some examples of this evidence.
#1H5.2. Trajectories of elementary particles. Nuclear physics provides numerous photographs of elementary particles, which show that the carriers of electric charges usually follow a spiral trajectory. Because the energy input for these particles may occur only at the initial point of their motion, such a spiral trajectory must be caused by some kind of disproportions in environmental resistance (e.g. a "spinning top" usually follows a spiral trajectory). This in turn means that they move in some kind of substance, not in an absolute vacuum. To make it clearer: if particles would move in a vacuum, as present science claims, then after an single initial impulse of energy, the trajectories of particles should be circular, elliptical, or parabolic (but not spiral).
#2H5.2. The formation of layers of "onion charcoal" at outlets from N poles of UFO propulsors. The extraordinary substance called here the "onion charcoal" is described in more details in subsection G2.3 of monograph [5/3] and in subsection O5.4 /?/ of this series of monographs. In order to summarize here the mechanism of formation of this substance, according to deductions from this subsection, every magnet is a kind of powerful vacuum cleaner which sucks counter-matter at the N (I) pole, while blowing up this counter-matter on the S (O) pole. In case of magnets so powerful as these used in propulsors of UFOs, the circulation of the counter-matter that they cause, theoretically speaking should be intensive enough to be able to electrify the particles of dry organic matter hovering in the air, to intercept these particles, and to form layers out of these particles at the "inlet" N to propulsors of UFO vehicles. Thus, if such UFO vehicles were flying horizontally at low heights, their powerful circulating magnetic field sucks the particles of dry organic matter that hover in the air, such as stems of dry grass, leaves, pieces of paper or old newspapers, etc. These organic particles mixed with dust, would then stick to the surface of UFO's hulk at the "inlet" (N) poles from the UFO propulsors. After they stick to these inlets, they would be subjected to the action of extremely powerful, pulsating magnetic field produced by a given propulsor. This field, like a huge microwave oven, would dry and turn into charcoal this organic matter that stuck to the "inlet" (N) pole of UFOs' propulsors, compressing this matter into cracked layers, the curvature of which reflects the curvature of UFO's hulk. Thus, when such a UFO vehicle during a next landing touches the ground with these layers of dried charcoal, the fragments of this organic matter must fall off from the hulk. People who investigate former UFO landings should sometimes find these curved layered pieces of charcoal looking like a segment of onion, that are lying near the centre of some UFO landings. After it is found, this charcoal should appear as a fragment of a huge onion, that is composed of easily separable spherical layers. After being touch, these layers should tend to disintegrate into individual leaves of the charcoal.
The "onion charcoal" so-far remained unknown to UFO investigators. The existence of this substance was firstly deduced theoretically on the basis of the Concept of Dipolar Gravity, and only then I managed to find it on real UFO landings. Only after the theoretical deduction of the above mechanism of the formation of onion charcoal, I started to seek this substance on UFO landings from New Zealand. In fact, directed by conclusions from my research I managed to find quite a number of samples of it - for their descriptions see subsection G2.3 of monograph [5/3], or subsection O5.4 /?/ from this series of monographs.
It is worth to add, that before it falls off from a UFO hulk, the black layer of cracked onion charcoal that sticks to outlets of UFO propulsors that emit light, give to this vehicle an extraordinary appearance. This appearance must resemble irregular cracks on a surface of dry mud, or a network of segments on snake skin, only that additionally glowing from underneath by pulsations of sparks from the oscillatory chambers of a UFO vehicle. For external observers, who are not familiar with the mechanism of formation and cracking of these natural charcoal sediments, such resembling "snake skin" black layer on the UFO surface, must make an impression of looking at skin of a living creature that is bursting with fire. No wonder that probably because of this appearance, in old days UFOs were called "dragons" or “serpents” and categorized to the same category as snakes - see descriptions of dragons from subsection O1 of this series of monographs and from subsection D3 of monograph [5/3]. In turn some present observers of UFOs, perhaps also because of this appearance, suggest that UFOs are creatures, multiplied or bred like animals, not build in factories like machines. Onion charcoal appears also in so-called "Moorish architecture". In this architecture, on roofs of buildings many characteristic "domes" are added. These domes actually symbolize UFO vehicles that hover above buildings. Interestingly, these "domes" in Moorish architecture are either white in colour, thus simulating the reflection of clean surfaces of UFO vehicles, or are black, thus reflecting surfaces of UFO vehicles covered with such "onion charcoal".

=> H5.3.
Antworten to top

Gehe zu:

Benutzer, die gerade dieses Thema anschauen: 1 Gast/Gäste