P7. To summarise
#1
@ Dr. Ing. Jan Pająk

P7. To summarise

As this is explained in subsection A4, the rational UFO research went through a long and thorny path, before reaching the level of knowledge which is proven correct in this chapter. This knowledge cost us dearly. It is also extremely precious. After all, it may save our civilisation from almost a sure destruction. So now, when we have this knowledge, let us not waste it, but utilise it to the purpose for which the universal intellect allowed us to gain it.

=> Figure P1a, P1b, P1c

Fig. P1.
The identical appearance of UFOs and the Magnocraft. A UFO photograph shown here was selected from a sequence of four colour pictures taken by Augusto Arranda near Yungay, Peru, in March 1967 - see [1P2] p. 119, [2P2] p. 39. The entire sequence presents two UFOs type K3 captured in the various stages of their decoupling and flying in opposite directions (before these photographs were taken both vehicles flown coupled into a spherical flying complex shown in Figure F1 "b" /?/). Both vehicles fly in the throbbing mode of operation, thus their hulk and shape are clearly visible. The geometrical analysis shows the striking similarities of these K3 type UFOs to the Magnocraft type K3 - see the framed part of this Figure, and also Figure F1 /?/. The outline of this UFO reminds us of an inverted saucer, the base of which is positioned perpendicular to the Earth's magnetic field force lines. In the centre of this vehicle the topside convex is clearly distinguishable (in the Magnocraft it houses the crew cabin and the central propulsion compartment where the main propulsor is located). The UFO also possesses a lens-shaped flange that fastens around the vehicle's base. In the Magnocraft type K3 this flange houses n=8 side propulsors.


a) The original (colour) printout of the Arranda’s photograph.

b) The external appearance of the Magnocraft type K3, drawn in such a manner that it fulfils the set of mathematical equations listed in Figure F18 /?/ and in Table F1, which precisely describe the shape, design, and dimensions of this vehicle.

It is worth to stress, that in the light of the formal proof that "UFOs are already completed Magnocraft" (see the conclusion from subsection P2.15), all Figures from this monograph that present Magnocraft are simultaneously illustrating UFOs of the same type.

c) The black-white print of the Arranda’s photograph. It shows more clearly various details of this K3 type UFO.

=> Figure 2a, 2b

Fig. P2.
The side flange and underside concave in UFOs revealed through the line of shadow.


a) The shadow caused by the orientation of this UFO in relation to the Sun reveals that in the centre of the UFO's base there is an underside concave (see also (12) and (14) in Figure F5 /?/) identical to the one appearing in the Magnocraft's shell. One of the photographs of a UFO taken by George Stock, Passaic, New Jersey, USA, on 29 July 1952 - see [1P2] page 94, [8P2] pp. 54-5. The vehicle is flying in the inverted position - compare this photo with Figure F4 "b" /?/.

b) The line of shadow that discloses the presence of a side flange in a UFO type K5. This photograph of a UFO type K5 was taken by Ralph Ditter over Zanesville, Ohio, USA, on November 13, 1966 - see [1P2] p. 103, [2P2] p. 253, [6P2] p. 92, [8P2] p. 140. The Sun was so positioned that its line of shadow revealed the outline of the crews' cabin and a flange. Thus, this photograph documents clearly that there is a horizontal flange at the base of UFOs, and that this flange has the shape of a horizontal lens. Thus the shape and location of this flange is identical to the flange of the Magnocraft - see also Figures F1 /?/ and F19 /?/. In the Magnocraft this flange houses the vehicle's side propulsors. Note that the apex angle of the conical side walls of the crew cabin is significantly wider in this K5 type of UFOs than the same angle in UFOs type K3 and K4 (compare outline of crew cabins in Figures P1, P2 (a), and P4).

=> Figure P3.

Fig. P3.
A shadow that reveals the outline of the central column and a ceiling in a UFO. An aerial photograph of a cigar-shaped UFO, taken from an aeroplane (at 2500 metres) by Inake Oses, over Calabozo Reservoir in Guarico, Venezuela, on 13 February 1966 - see [1P2] p. 185, [2P2] p. 256. The Sun's location shades the black round space in the middle of this spaceship and so reveals that through the centre of UFOs a type of vertical cylinder must run. An identical cylinder, designed to house the main magnetic propulsor, must appear in the structure of every vehicle that utilizes the Magnocraft's principles of operation (see (3) and (5) in Figure F5 /?/ and also Figure F18 /?/).

=> Figure P4 upper, P4 lower

Fig. P4.
Side walls of the crew cabin in a UFO type K4. Frame no. 9 from the series of 12 colour photographs of a UFO type K4 taken by Rudi Nagora, 8 km south of Deutschlandsberg, Austria, on 21 May 1971 - see [1P2] page 125. The action of a magnetic lens caused the parts of the UFO located close to the magnetic propulsors, i.e. the flange and the topside dome, to remain partially invisible in this photograph (see also Figure P26). Notice a slight difference between the apex angle of the conical crew cabin walls from the above vehicle type K4 and the same angle in UFOs type K3 and K5 shown in Figures P1 and P2 (a) (see also a UFO type K6 in Figure P9, and outlines of subsequent types of Magnocraft from Figure F19 /?/).


(Upper) The entire photograph taken by Rudi Nagora. (Lower) A close-up enlargement of this UFO.

=> Figure P5

Fig. P5.
A photograph of a K8 type UFO taken by an unknown person from Grenoble, France, on 12 February 1971. The object was photographed over Corsica, near Olmo, 20km from Bastia - see [1P2], p. 129. Although the UFO type K8 from this photo is clearly visible, its shape differs from the small types of UFOs (i.e. K3 to K5) known to the majority of investigators as "typical". This is because UFOs type K7 to K10 contain a prominent complementary flange (see (6) in Figure F5 /?/) which deforms the outlines of their topside dome. Therefore, for some "UFO experts" this difference in shape sufficed to proclaim the above photograph as a "hoax" or at least a "controversy". (Using a similar argument some "UFO experts" also tried to disqualify the photograph from Figure P6.) Of course geometrical analysis confirms that the shell's formation in this UFO exactly corresponds to the equations from figure F18 (for K=8). Moreover, there are also other UFO photographs available which display the same shape (e.g. see the photo published in OMNI magazine, Vol. 7, No. 6, March 1985, page 95). This confirms that the above photograph is in fact genuine, and also proves that all the equations deduced about the Magnocraft are applicable to the description of UFO shapes.

=> Figure P6 upper, P6 lower

Fig. P6.
One of the best photographs of a UFO type K10 taken to date. The object was photographed by Ed Keffel and Joao Martins, two journalists from the "O Cruzeiro" magazine, over Bara de Tijuca, Brazil, on May 7, 1952 - see [1P2] p. 108, [2P2] p. 43, [6P2] p. 6, [8P2] pp. 48-9. The geometrical shape of this vehicle strictly fulfils the equations from figure F18. Note the spherical casing of the main propulsor visible through the transparent shell of the topside dome. See also Figure F19 /?/.


(Upper) The entire photograph (one from a series of five shots of the same object). (Lower) A close-up of the UFO.

=> Figure 7

Fig. P7.
Legs of a UFO on the so-called Yorba Linda UFO photograph. It was taken on January 24, 1967 by a fourteen year-old boy (name withheld by request) 60km from Los Angeles, California, USA, through a window of his home in Yorba Linda - see [1P2] p. 182, [2P2] p. 398. It presents an ascending UFO flying in the magnetic whirl mode of operation, while four of its telescopic legs are still extended (the fourth leg is invisible on this photo but it was reported by the witness). The angular positioning of the legs of this object perfectly match the identical orientation of legs predicted for the small types of the Magnocraft (e.g. K3 type - see also Figure F1 /?/). The UFO is surrounded by a whirl of ionized air which in daylight gives the impression of a dark cloud - see also Figures F27 /?/ and P20. Although this whirl would destroy external objects, the vehicle's legs and periscopes are protected by magnetic deflectors and so they can protrude through the layer of a whirling plasma. Various details of this UFO (e.g. the shape of the magnetic whirl that it creates) indicate that it belongs to a small type, most probably K3.

=> Figure P8

Fig. P8. A table that comprises the compendium of UFO shapes. It was compiled by Knut Aasheim and published in the book [1P2.1.1] by Francis Hitching, "The World Atlas of Mysteries", Book club Associates & Pan Books Ltd., London 1981, page 188. According to the Theory of the Magnocraft, all the shapes shown in this diagram may represent various appearances of the same class of discoidal UFOs. The reason for such a variety of witnesses' perceptions of the same shaped objects lies in the "vision distorting factors" listed in subsection P2.1.1. These factors in certain conditions cause the UFOs' appearance to drastically differ from their true shape. For example, the shape D/7 in the above diagram represents a slanted twin-chamber capsule from the main magnetic propulsor, observed from below, when the remaining shell of a discoidal object diminishes because of the action of a magnetic lens (see also the encounters illustrated in Figures S1 and S5). The shape D/2 is obtained when many discoidal UFOs are coupled together into a flying system - see also Figure F12 /?/.

=> Figure P9a, P9b, P9c, P9d, P9e


Fig. P9.
A spherical flying complex of two UFOs, type K6, photographed over Sweden by Lars Thorn on 6 May 1971 (see also Figure F10 /?/).
a) The theoretical appearance of a spherical flying complex formed from two Magnocraft type K3 (instead from two UFOs type K6 shown on the Thorn's photo). The theoretical shape and appearance of Magnocraft type K6 is illustrated in Figures F13 /?/ and F25 /?/.
b) The cut-away in the spherical complex of Magnocraft type K3 that shows the theoretical principle of formation of such a complex. Shown are: the orientation of magnetic poles (N, S) in the main propulsor (M) and in subsequent side propulsors (U); mutual location of crew cabins (1, 2) of both vehicles; "onion charcoal" "C" which in special circumstances settles on the (N) outlet from the main propulsor; and the so-called "angel's hair" (A) which is a kind of jelly hydraulic substance (similar to white from eggs) positioned between both vehicles in order to neutralize forces of mutual attraction between their main propulsors. The onion charcoal pills from UFOs during landing. In turn angel's chair fall down after both vehicles separate from each other. The silky strands of angel's chair can frequently be spotted when they lie on fields or hang from trees before they have the time to evaporate.
c) The entire frame of Thorn's photograph. It shows a UFO hovering motionlessly. From my research it appears that a crew of such a UFO includes scientists specialised in geological research. (This is why landings of UFOs type K6 can be found near stones, interesting cracks of the soil, etc.) It is worth to notice that a UFO from this photograph also seems to be interested in nearby geological structures.
d) The enlargement of the photographed complex of the K6 UFOs from part ©. On this enlargement the correctness of equation (F10) for the K coefficient can be verified. (For a spherical flying complexes this equation takes the form (F17): K=2D/H.) For UFOs and Magnocraft type K6 this coefficient takes the value of K=6.
e) The reconstruction of the appearance and shape of this complex, prepared by the Stockholm investigating group GICOFF. This reconstruction, together with the above photographs, is published in [1P2] p. 81. It very clearly reveals the double flange that fastens the resultant complex half way of its height. This flange is formed through coupling together the lens-shaped side flanges of both vehicles. In the lower vehicle, the outlet from the main propulsor is visible. In the upper vehicle four black bars are visible as they stem from side propulsors.

=> Figure P10a, P10b, P10c, P10d


Fig. P10.
Day and night photographs of two cigar-shaped flying complexes of UFOs. Both these objects fly in the magnetic whirl mode of operation, so their real shapes are concealed by the whirling cloud of ionized air. But the visible irregularities in the plasma whirls reveal the segmental structure of the complexes hidden inside (compare also the photograph published in OMNI magazine, September 1982 issue, page 99, and [8P2] p. 42). Thus, the above photographs confirm that the cigar-shaped UFOs are in fact composed of a number of smaller discoidal vehicles - as explained in Figure F7 /?/.


a) A night-time photograph of a stacked-cigar complex of UFOs, taken by a police patrol over Palermo, Sicily, Italy, on 13 December 1978.

b) The double-ended cigar-shaped complex of UFOs photographed by George Adamski, over Palomar Gardens, USA, on May 1, 1952 - see [1P2] p. 191.

c) A night photograph of a cigar-shaped flying complex formed from several UFOs. It was taken on 20 march 1950 over New York, USA. It was published in the book by David C. Knight: "UFOs: A Pictoral History from Antiquity to the Present", McGraw-Hill Book Company (1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020, USA), New York-St.Louis-San Francisco, 1980, ISBN 0-07-035103-1, page 43. The enlargement of the same object (but without the background - see d)) was also published in the OMNI magazine, issue from September 1982, page 99. This particular photograph excellently confirms that cigar-shaped UFOs are actually composed of several discoidal vehicles, as this is explained in Figure F7 /?/.

d) The enlargement of the vehicle from part c).

=> Figure P11 upper, P11 lower


Fig. P11.
Two illustrations documenting that UFOs also form "fir-tree" flying complexes (see also Figure F8 "b").


(Upper) A UFO witnessed by Mrs. Josephine Hewison of Lower Broadmoor Farm, West Wales, England, at about 8 a.m. on Saturday, 26 March 1977. This drawing is published in [2P2] "The Unexplained" magazine, Vol. 4, Issue 44, p. 877;

(Lower) The object witnessed by a woman who wishes to be known as Mrs. W. The sighting took place about 50 kilometres north-east of Launceston, Tasmania, Australia, at 5:20 p.m. on 22 September 1974. Published in [3P2] "The Unexplained", Vol. 7, Issue 74, p.1480.

=> Figure P12

Fig. P12. A drawing of a detached configuration formed from two UFOs type K3 (see also Figure F6). It was observed by Captain Chrysologo Rocha and his family (eight witnesses in all) on 10 January 1958, near Curitiba, Brazil. The first presentation of this drawing that came in the author's possession was published in [4P2] "The Unexplained", Vol. 5, Issue 57, page 1140.

=> Figure P13

Fig. P13.
A photograph of a semi-detached configuration of UFOs. It is the so-called "Oregon UFO". This object was taken by a Ph.D. biochemistry consultant while it was hovering over the forest in Willamette Pass, northern Oregon, USA, on November 22, 1966 - see [1P2] p. 84, [4P2] p. 114, [6P2] p. 114. The object represents a semi-attached configuration formed from two spherical complexes of K6 type vehicles, joined by their domes (see also Figure P9). The final shape corresponds precisely to the configuration of the Magnocraft shown in figure F9 b /?/).

=> Figure P14


Fig. P14.
A photo of a carrier platform formed from a large mother ship carrying a number of small UFOs (see also Figure F11 "a" /?/). This arrangement was photographed over West New York, New Jersey, USA, on July 7, 1967 - see [6P2] p. 111, [8P2] p. 159. A similar carrier platform, but captured at a less spectacular angle, was photographed by W. D. Hall over Australia in 1954 - see [6P2] p. 56, [8P2] p. 66.

=> Figure P15


Fig. P15.
The location of propulsors in a UFO type K3. It documents that propulsors of Magnocraft and UFOs are located identically.


(Upper) A drawing of the Magnocraft type K3 seen from underneath. It shows the location of Magnocraft's propulsors. It illustrates how in appropriate conditions (dusk, damp air) a K3 type Magnocraft would look like when viewed from below. It is drawn as if the twin-chamber capsules of all its propulsors operate with the same phase shift (i.e.in the throbbing mode). The vehicle's propulsors can easily be identified because of the glowing patches of ionized air at their outlets. When the light is subdued these glowing patches should be visible for an outside observer. If a Magnocraft flies in the Southern Hemisphere, the side propulsors (marked U, V, W, X) should emit a reddish-yellow light because their North (N) magnetic poles are oriented downwards. But the main propulsor (marked M) should emit a blue-green light because its South (S) magnetic pole points downwards. Note that these colours are reversed (i.e. a reddish-yellow replaces a blue-green and vice verse) when the Magnocraft flies in the inverted position or changes hemispheres. Also, when viewed from overhead, the outlets of the same propulsors have colours which are the reverse of those seen from below.

(Lower) A UFO type K3 photographed from beneath while hovering over Butterworth, Malaysia, on 3 January, 1979. The above photograph was published in the January 4 1979 edition of the "National Echo", Penang, Malaysia, and subsequently reproduced in the February 1980 issue of the "Mufon UFO Journal", page 8. Unfortunately the original print of this photo was unobtainable to the author, thus its newspaper copy can only be reproduced here. It shows the glowing areas appearing at the outlets from the vehicle's propulsors. Thus, the photograph allows us to determine the location of these propulsors in the shell. The mutual orientation of the propulsors (the main one is placed in the centre of the UFO and is surrounded by eight side propulsors), also their number and positioning in relation to the edges of the shell, correspond exactly to the details of the K3 type of Magnocraft shown in part (upper) of this Figure (compare this Figure and Table F1 and Figure F28 /?/). Note that a similar photograph, but of a UFO type K5 oriented more sideways, was taken by Norman Neilson of Greta Valley Road, Motunau Beach, North Canterbury, New Zealand on 27 October 1979 (its copy is published in Figure P16 below).

=> Figure P16


Fig. P16.
The Motunau Beach UFO (type K5). It was taken on October 27th 1979. This photograph belongs to Mr Norman Neilson of Greta Valley Road, Motunau Beach, North Canterbury, New Zealand. It shows the areas of ionized air at the outlets of the spacecraft's side propulsors - compare with Figure P15. Because of the unfavorable light conditions when this photograph was taken, the outline of the spacecraft itself remains elusive. This photo was an object of study conducted by a former Air Force photography expert, the late Mr Dickeson of Timaru, New Zealand. He discovered that each light source consists of two segments varying in intensity, like the side walls of a cube. This endorses the interpretation that the columns of magnetic field produced by the UFO's propulsion are square in cross-section, and that each pair of segments in the photograph represent two side surfaces of these columns. Therefore the above photograph is additional evidence supporting the hypothesis that UFOs utilize Oscillatory Chambers to produce a magnetic field used by their propulsion.

=> Figure P17a, P17b


Fig. P17.
Photographs which captured UFO vehicles which use their propulsors in the function of searchlights beaming to the Earth columns of light.


a) A night photograph of a UFO over Japan published in the book [7P2] by Allan Hendry (Foreword by J. Allen Hynek ): "The UFO Handbook", Sphere Books Limited, London, England, 1980, page 48. A thin beam of light is emanating from each propulsor of this vehicle. Thus the unusual stratification of this beam of light results from the fact that it formed not by a single source, but by 9 different propulsors, each of which is beaming a separate column of light. The UFO vehicle which generates this light is of K3 type, thus it has 8 side propulsors and one main propulsors. Another interesting aspect of this photograph is that the light appears only after around 4 diameters of this vehicle from its base, and that points where subsequent beams of light appear reflect the parabolic shape of magnetic circuits of that UFO vehicle – see also Figure F24 /?/. This in turn confirms the capability of UFOs magnetic field to form „magnetic lens” which hides from human sight whatever was covered by this magnetic lens.

b) An anonymous photograph which captured a UFO beaming columns of light at New York. Notice the strong glow in clods caused by the powerful magnetic field of this UFO.

=> Figure P18a, P18b, P18c, P18d

Fig. P18.
Pulsating field of UFOs. These are examples of UFO photographs which document the pulsating character of the vehicles' magnetic field. On each of these pictures it was only possible to see the fragment of the vehicle's magnetic circuit, which was oriented in the direction of the photographer. Notice that because of poor light conditions (night or evening) and the high speed of the photographed UFOs, the above pictures only captured flashes of the air ionized by the strands of the pulsating magnetic field, whereas the vehicles' shell remained invisible.


a) Principles for the formation of such multiple images of a single magnetic circuit of a UFO vehicle fast flying when its magnetic field pulsates - originally these principles are explained in Figure F29 /?/ from monograph 3 of this series. In subsequent parts of this illustration are explained: a) – the outline of a Magnocraft or a UFO with an indication of the layer of glowing air which flashes when being ionized along a side "magnetic circuit" (i.e. along the path of magnetic field force lines which join the opposite outlets of the same side propulsor). Because this layer of the air "flashes" in rhythm of pulsations of the magnetic field yield to the environment by a given side propulsor, while each "flash" lasts just a short moment of time, the fast motion of the vehicle leaves a chain of such flashes spread along the trajectory this vehicle follows. Symbols appearing on this part of the drawing: V - speed vector, T - period of pulsation of the magnetic flux (F) generated by side propulsors of this vehicle, t - time. b) - an illustration which documents what would contain a photograph of this spacecraft taken at night. Only the flashes from the air ionized by the magnetic circuit of a side propulsor are visible in darkness. The spreading of these flashes indicates the movement of the propulsor during the time of film exposure. c) - a curve F=f(t) of a variation in time (t) of the magnetic flux (F) produced by the side propulsor of the Magnocraft. This variation corresponds to the "beat type curve" that is formed in the result of mutual subtraction of two sinusoidal curves (for more comprehensive description of principles and reasons of this subtraction see the operation of so-called "twin-chamber capsule" formed from Oscillatory Chambers of Magnocraft's propulsors - presented in subsection C7.1 /?/ and in Figure C7 /?/ of this monograph). Such a "beat-type curve" is composed from a straight line (i.e. the constant magnetic flux of the value "Fo"), onto which every period "T" is superimposed a short "pulse" of the amplitude ∆F. The magnetic field whose intensity pulsates according to such a "beat-type curve" ionizes the air only when its value goes through a next "peak". Therefore layers of air ionized by a vehicle's magnetic circuits must appear as a chain of individual flashes visible in part a) of this drawing (instead of a continuous glow).

b) Photo of just such flashes of the air ionised by pulsating field of a UFO taken by Ken Chamberlain, over the southwest part of the freeway called "the outerbelt" that encircles Columbus, Ohio, USA, near a small town Grove City, about 10 p.m. on 17 October 1973. (Description of this photograph can be found in the book [1P2] page 205, while originally this photograph was published on the front page of "The Columbus Dispatch", issue dated on 18 October 1973.)

c) Photo taken by Karl Maier, over Wolfsburg, West Germany, on 26 February 1962 - see [1P2] page 235. Principles involved in the formation of flashes captured in this photo are exactly the same as these in the photo from part (b), only that the UFO directed towards the photographer a different magnetic circuit.

d) Still another night photograph of flashing UFO circuits similar to photo from part b).

=> Figure P19a, P19b, P19c, P19d

Fig. P19.
Photographs which document the formation of magnetic circuits and magnetic whirl by UFOs. Parts (a) and (b) use example of the Magnocraft type K6 to explain the formation and the course of magnetic circuits around these vehicles. (“Magnetic circuits” are simply strands of magnetic field force lines that link (via the environment) the N poles of given propulsors with S poles of the same or other propulsors.) The spinning of these circuits produces a magnetic whirl. Because the vehicle's powerful magnetic field ionizes air, the whirling strands of the magnetic field force lines can be captured on photographs taken at darkness with a very short time of exposure (i.e. when the motion of the strands is unnoticeable on a single frame).


a) The Magnocraft type K6 in side view. It illustrates the main and side magnetic circuits in one of their many possible positions. The location of the field's strands reflects the situation shown in diagram from part (b). Symbols: N, S - magnetic poles in the vehicle's propulsors.

b) Whirling magnetic circuits of the Magnocraft type K6 in an overhead view. It presents the spinning magnetic circuits frozen in one of their many positions. Broken line frames the section captured in the photograph shown in part (d). Notice that the output from side propulsors has a sinusoidal distribution, i.e. if the side propulsors "U" (shown here with the blackened outlets - see also labels U, V, W, X in Figure F26 /?/) have their maximal output, the output from propulsors "V" (dotted, located after "U"), fall into its mean value, propulsors "W" (blank, located after "V") produce no output at all, whereas the output of propulsors "X" (dotted) is raised to its mean value. This sinusoidal distribution of outputs is reflected by the thickness of the magnetic circuits which link side propulsors with the main one.

c) A night-time photograph of two UFOs type K6 coupled into a "flying cluster". It was published in the Journal [5P2] "UFO Sightings" (USA), January 1981 edition, page 15. This photo is the best presentation known to the author of the magnetic circuits of a UFO shown from the side view - i.e. as illustrated in part (a). It definitely confirms that the strands of magnetic field force lines join the outlet from the vehicle's main propulsor with the outlets from side propulsors, ionizing the air on their paths. The flying cluster shown here is very similar to the one shown in part (a) of Figure F13 /?/.

d) The photograph of a UFO type K6 flying in the magnetic whirl mode of operation. It was taken by Enrique Hausmann over Mallorka (Palma Island), Spain, on 24 April 1950 - see [1P2] page 218. The UFO travelled from east to west, appeared to rotate, and produced a loud buzzing sound. The photograph captures, from below, an outlet of the vehicle's main propulsor. Five strands of spinning force lines of the main magnetic circuits are spiralling radial from this outlet - as illustrated by the drawing in part (b). At the edges of the photograph, each one of these five strands splits into three separate streams of the field's force lines. Notice that each middle stream engages more energy from the field than the two side streams. This results from the sinusoidal distribution of the outputs from the vehicle's side propulsors - as explained in part (b) and in the description from subsection F7.2).

=> Figure P20

Fig. P20.
A ionic picture of a magnetic whirl in a UFO type K4. It is revealed on this night-time photograph of a landed UFO type K4 taken by an anonymous photographer in Genui, Italy, on 23 June 1963 - see [1P2] page 184. It was first published in the Journal "Domenica del Corriere", 8 September 1963. The above photograph perfectly illustrates the ionic picture of the UFO's magnetic whirl and its similarities to the Magnocraft's picture - compare this photo with Figure F27 /?/. Shown are all the elements characteristic for such an ionic picture of a whirl. The photograph also illustrates the three telescopic legs extended to support the landed vehicle, a ladder, and a set of periscopes allowing for the visual observation of the environment. Notice that the legs are located at an angle slanted towards the vehicle's base - see also Figure A1 /?/.

=> Figure P21a, P21b

Fig. P21.
Ionic pictures of magnetic whirls in UFOs type K7 and K8. Two classic UFO photographs taken in daylight that illustrate various forms of the ionic picture of a magnetic whirl. Both vehicles ascend with the magnetic whirl mode of operation. See also Figure F27 /?/.


(a) The photograph of a UFO type K7 taken by Mr Paul Trent of McMinnville, Oregon, USA, on May 11, 1950, at about 7:45 p.m. - see [1P2] p. 105, [2P2] p. 223, [5P2] p. 71, [6P2] p. 72, [8P2] pp. 41-2.

(b) The photograph of a UFO type K8 taken by a pilot over Rouen, France, in March 1954 - [1P2] p. 107, [2P2] p. 330, [7P2] p.14, [8P2] p.42.

=> Figure 22 upper, P22 lower

Fig. P22.
An extremely fast moving UFO. It was taken by Mrs Edwards B. of Devona Street, Aspley, Brisbane, Australia, on 12 May 1973. She took this photograph while on holiday when Mr Sinel (her friend) fell from a yacht into the water, approximately 6km off the south-east Bay of Mayor Island (Tuhua Rocks), New Zealand. After the film was developed, a vehicle unnoticed by witnesses at the time appeared to fly just above the horizon. The estimated speed of this UFO was about 60,000 kilometres per hour. On the next frame, taken a few seconds later, the vehicle did not appear.


(Upper) The entire frame. (Lower) The blow-up of the flying UFO.

=> Figure 23

Fig. P23.
A night photograph of a spherical flying complex formed from two K3 type UFOs flying in a magnetic whirl mode of operation - compare also Figures F1 "b" /?/, and F27 /?/. This illustration shows only a single frame from the large color movie film taken over Kaikoura, New Zealand, on the night of December 31, 1979, from the deck of a cargo airliner "Argosy". The history of this movie is the subject of two books: [8P2] by Captain Bill L. Startup and Neil Illingworth, "The Kaikoura UFOs" (Hodder and Stoughton Ltd., Auckland 1980, ISBN 0-340-256893); and [9P2] by Quentin Fogarty, "Let's hope they're friendly" (A.H.&A.W. Reed Ltd., Wellington, New Zealand 1982, ISBN 0-598-01463-3). The interesting detail revealed by the above frame is the lack of symmetry between the ionic whirls produced by the lower and upper vehicles. The ionic picture of a whirl formed by the lower (inverted) UFO of this complex takes a regular, hemispherical shape. The location of the characteristic whirl elements in this lower picture is indicated through the changes in density of the air ionization, not through the course of the whirl outlines (as is the case with the upper part of this picture). Such a dynamic asymmetry in the whirl's shape of this spherical complex results from the principles of the magnetic buoyance formation, i.e. the weight of the UFO compresses the magnetic circuits under a lower vehicle in a way similar to a cushion being squashed by a person who sits on it, whereas the spinning of these circuits shapes them into a regular hemisphere.

=> Figure P24a, P24b


Fig. P24.
Two night photographs of UFOs flying in a throbbing mode of operation. (a) A night photo of a UFO type K3 flying in a throbbing mode of operation. The above photograph (originally in color) was taken on 2 August 1965 by 14 year old Alan Smith, over Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA - see [1P2] p. 241 and [2P2] p. 371. In the centre of this UFO, at the outlet from its main propulsor, a layer of ionized air glowing a blue color is visible. Around the vehicle's flange the air ionized by the magnetic field from the side propulsors is glowing a yellow-red color. The non-glowing main body of the UFO remains invisible in darkness.

Compare the above photograph with Figures F28 /?/ and P24 b). b) A single frame from a color movie film of a UFO taken at night by Ellis E. Matthews above Alberton,
South Australia, in 1967 - see book by Bruce Cathie & P.N. Temm, "Harmonic 695" (Wellington, N.Z., 1971, ISBN 0-589-01054-9) page 134. It presents a stationary vehicle type K5 hovering in darkness in the throbbing mode of operation. The film captured only a glow of air, ionized by the magnetic field from the vehicle's propulsors. The main body of the UFO remained invisible in darkness. In the above photograph the colors of the glowing air provide perfect confirmation for the statements of the Theory of the Magnocraft. The air at the single outlet from the main propulsor, whose axis is slanted from the centre, glows a yellow-orange color, whereas the ring of outlets from the side propulsors induces a blue-green glow. This means that the UFO's topside was oriented towards the photographer, so in the main propulsor a north (N) magnetic pole prevails, whereas in the side propulsors their south (S) poles are displayed - see also Figure F28 /?/. Compare the colors from this frame taken in the southern hemisphere with the colors in the photograph from Figure P24 a) taken in the northern hemisphere. (Notice that in the different hemispheres the polarity of the UFOs' propulsors must be reversed.)

=> Figure P25

Fig. P25.
A photograph of a stationary UFO hovering in a "magnetic lens" mode of operation. It was taken when the sky was apparently empty. The above picture documents the ability of UFOs to create a very efficient magnetic lens. It was taken by Andy Collins in May 1979 over Prestatyn, England, and subsequently published in the book [10P2] by J. Randles & P. Whetnall, "Alien Contact", Neville Spearman Ltd., Suffolk, England, 1981, ISBN 85435-444-1, page 45. Notice two white spots which reveal the vehicle's side propulsors oriented towards the photographer in such a way that their strong glow penetrated from inwards through the magnetic lens.

=> Figure P26

Fig. P26.
A Spanish UFO photograph which reveals the action of a magnetic lens. Three frames from a large set of daylight photographs taken by Antonio Pardo over San Jose de Valeras (Spain) about 8:30 p.m. on June 1, 1966 - see [1P2] p. 159. This photograph shows a spherical complex of two K7 type UFOs (see also Figures S1 and P30 showing UFOs of the same type only that coupled into different arrangements). The outlines of both vehicles are distorted by the strong action of the magnetic lens. The areas affected by this lens are concentrated around the propulsors of the UFOs. Thus the flanges containing the side propulsors are only partially visible, whereas the spherical bowls that cover the ceilings of the crews' cabins are completely diminished. On high quality copies of this photograph a faint outline of the spherical bowl at the top of the upper vehicle is slightly distinguishable.

=> Figure P27a, P27b, P27c

Fig. P27.
Magnetic character of UFO flights - photographs and illustrations of supporting deductions.


a), b) Two formations of UFOs taken by Carl R. Hart, Jr. above Lubbock, Texas, USA, on the evening of 31 August 1951 - see [1P2] p. 211, and [2P2] p. 215, [8P2] p. 46. Five pictures of the two UFO formations flying in two different directions were taken. The above photograph shows the V-formation of UFOs flying in a magnetic whirl mode of operation. The ionic pictures of the vehicles' whirls take the very unusual shape of "shoes". As it is explained in Figure P27 c) such "shoe-shapes" result from the requirement that UFOs must always fly with their base perpendicular to the local course of the force lines of the Earth's magnetic field. Thus this photograph adds significantly to the proof that UFOs obey the laws of magnetic flight.

c) The drawings illustrating the deductions by Renato Vesco. They are published in [1P2] p. 212. In 1972, an Italian investigator Renato Vesco proved that UFOs flying slanted from the least aerodynamic resistance orientation must produce a "shoe-shaped" ionic picture of a whirl. His proof supported by the photograph presented in Figure P27 a), b) confirms that UFOs fly in the non-aerodynamic magnetic manner that contradicts the laws of hydromechanics. The primary condition always fulfilled during this flight is that UFOs are oriented so that their bases are perpendicular to the force lines of the Earth's magnetic field.

=> Figure P28a. P28b

Fig. P28.
An example of an unjustified claim for a genuine UFO photograph being a hoax, only because the computer technique of "digital image enhancement" revealed a form that resembles a vertical "thread" running above the object. The deductions from subsection P2.10 indicate, however, that the "thread" is in fact an effect of the light being dissipated by the central magnetic circuit of this UFO. This invisible circuit of the highly concentrated magnetic field yielded from the vehicle's main Oscillatory Chamber: (1) must be positioned exactly in the indicated place, (2) should take the presented proportions of dimensions, and (3) its interaction with light should produce the impression of a rectangular column - in fact appearing on the image (hoaxers would not use a rectangular thread!). Moreover, the same computer image also revealed edges of the "topside alignment cone" and the "complementary flange" visible at the upper side of the vehicle. These edges are distinguishable features for the UFO type K7 - see (2) and (6) in Figure F5 /?/ and Figure F19 /?/. But the so-called hoaxers could not possibly have known about them. Therefore, the edges additionally testify to the authenticity
of this photograph.
a) An original photograph of the K7 type UFO, taken by an anonymous photographer calling
himself "N.N." on 1 June 1966 over San Jose de Valderas, Spain - see [1P2] p. 161, [8P2] p. 161. It is one of a series of photographs of the same UFO vehicle taken by two independent photographers - see also Figure P26.

b) A computer image of the object from this photograph, produced with the use of the "digital image enhancement" technique and published in the book [7P2] p. 208. This image is claimed to be the "undisputed proof" that the photograph is a hoax. No investigator to-date has had the courage to argue with such "scientific evidence" and to provide a fair interpretation of the image.

=> Figure 29

Fig. P29.
A next proof of ignorance in UFO matters of the so-called "experts" in space research. This photograph was taken on 16 October 1994 by American orbital telescope Hubble (Hubble's Space Telescope), while on 9 January 1995 disseminated by NASA as a photograph of head-on collision of two galaxies. The above colour reprint was published on the first page of the Malaysian daily the New Straits Times, issue dated 12 January 1995. But it was also published in several other periodicals. It presents 4 large elliptical objects, plus several smaller round red stars. From the left side this photograph presents the first blue elliptical object in the shape of deformed wheel, on the centre of which a second red object four times smaller is superimposed. In the right top corner there are two further elliptical objects - red at the top, while slightly lower a blue one. Both are exactly four times smaller than the blue ellipsis from the left side. According to the official explanation provided under this photograph, it supposed to present a head-on collision of two galaxies. But in reality it presents a formation of four UFO vehicles, what is unambiguously indicated by the evidence discussed in subsection P2.14.2. From the left side flies a larger UFO type K5 of the second generation (with octagonal oscillatory chambers) which makes gas glow in blue colour. Above the central axis of this UFO flies a smaller UFO type K3 which makes the gas glow red. These UFOs are accompanied by another two UFO vehicles type K3 that fly on the right side. All four vehicles fly in the magnetic whirl mode of operation - compare the above photograph with photographs from Figures P14 and P24. The fact that these are UFO vehicles can be easily proven empirically. Otherwise then galaxies which stay in the same spot for millions of years, today these UFO vehicles are not present in the point of space in which they were then photographed (after all they flown away to complete other tasks).


In time just after being taken and interpreted by NASA, the above photograph was treated as a symbol of triumph of the dazzling accomplishments of Earth's orthodox science - and as such it was reproduced on many journals and periodicals. But the universal intellect must have a high sense of humour because in reality the above photograph is a symbol of ignorance and self-admiration of Earth's science in the confrontation with technology of UFOs that occupy our planet.

=> Figure P30

Fig. P30.
The location of subdivision walls, gates, spaces, and the use of volume of a UFO K7 type. (See also Figure F39 /?/ and subsection F2.5 /?/, which illustrate and explain the subsequent spaces distinguished in these vehicles.) This K7 UFO vehicle is subdivided into seven "concentric spaces" on the above illustration marked with numbers (1) to (7). Each space is separated from the remaining ones with hermetic "subdivision walls", which in case of decompression of the remaining parts of the vehicle still maintain air in them. Through these subdivision walls seven hermetic "gates" lead marked with numbers of spaces that given gates connect, e.g. gate (37) connects (3) and (7). In order to make evacuation easier, these gates are located through and through towards each other (means one opposite the other). The first of these spaces performs the function of "captain bridge" (1) and is occupied by the crew on duty, i.e. captain, pilots, navigators, communication officers, and their equipment. Radially to it, along its ceiling and external walls strands (CMS) of "magnetic circuits" of the vehicle are spreading, which resemble beams from the cedar wood to outside observers. The second space is the "specialist hall" (2) the equipment and the functions of which are adjusted to the specialisation of a given UFO vehicle (e.g. in a vehicle that specialises in the medical activities it is occupied by operational tables and medical equipment). The third space is the "engine room" (3) located in the centre of the spaceship and adjusted to the inner walls of the captain bridge (1). The "engine room" has a shape of the ring (or a cylinder). In the centre of it a huge transparent cylinder (PM) is visible, which contains oscillatory chambers of the main propulsor (M) of this UFO vehicle. Above the ceiling and floor of the engine room inter-propulsor magnetic circuits (CMS) are branching from the main magnetic column (CM) produced by the main propulsor (M). The appearance of the column (CM) with the circuits (CMS) which branch from it, resemble a huge tree - see also parts A and B of Figure P19. The telekinetic field, from which in UFOs of the second and third generations these magnetic circuits (CM) and (CMS) are formed, is capable to induce the growth, health, and good feelings in all living organisms that are subjected to it - see descriptions from subsection NB3. Therefore the column (CM) that branches at the top and bottom into magnetic circuits (CMS) can be called the "tree of life". The fourth space is the ring-shaped gallery of side propulsors (4). Around its outside circumference it is surrounded by a row of columns (PS) containing side propulsors (S), which look as if they are made of the olive wood. The fifth space are crew quarters (5). It is contained in the side flange of K7 type UFO, and it has the shape of a ring height at DS = 2.04 [metres] and wide L = 10.28 [metres]. Various life support compartments are located in it (e.g. kitchen, dining room), resting and recreation compartments, and individual crew cabins. The side magnetic circuits (CS) running along their external surfaces look as silver beams, while the side propulsors (S) visible through wall (PS) - like golden cubes. The sixth space contains storage areas and freezers (6). It holds, amongst others, freezing compartments used for storage of bodies that are required to be conserved - e.g. bodies of dead members of crew. The seventh concentric space is contained in the area swept by the magnetic field of the vehicle, i.e. it is contained inside of the central column (PM) with the main propulsor (M) and spreads also above the ceiling of the "engine room" (3). It performs the function of a rubbish dump (7). The internal walls of the central column (PM) which are adjusted to the engine room are supporting cells similar to a honeycomb. Each single cell of prepared as a separate container for rubbish (as rubbish the crew of a UFO treats also bodies of people dead during medical experiments that went wrong at a given UFO, people that died in the result of accident caused by the flight or landing of this UFO, and also people killed by mascots of UFOnauts - e.g. griffins described in subsection R4.2). Between both levels of UFO type K7 runs a spiral elevator ramp (E), which is like a staircase without stairs. This ramp has three hermetic gates: 2E, E6, and E1 which link it with the adjusted spaces.

=> Figure P31

Fig. P31.
The imprint of human foot which is around 550 million year-old. It was found west from a small township Delta in Utah state of the USA. In 1968 the late Bill (William) Meister was hunting for "trilobite" fossils. Widely known in the USA deposits of these fossils are located west from this Delta township. When he split layers of rocks in search of these fossils he almost got petrified from a shock - in one of layers he encountered the imprint of a human sole. This shoe even had a heel.


The imprint shown here was examined by Mr Evan Hansen (HC 76 Box 258, Beryl, Utah 84714, USA). Hansen was a person specially qualified for this research, because 11 years of his life he spend as a shoe repairer in a shoe repairing shop, while for 7 years was a manager of this shop. According to his words, this imprint tells its own story. Without any doubt it is an imprint of a human shoe. Whoever made it was the same human as is every person who today is walking on our planet. On the basis of his experience Mr Hansen guarantees chances are zero that this imprint is anything other then the imprint of a human shoe.

According to the analysis of Mr Hansen, the imprint shows the right leg. This is obvious from a metatarsal bulge at the base of the big toe. Also the heel is worn at the outer edge, exactly the same as modern humans firstly wear their heel on the outer edge. The owner of this shoe was build the same as Mr Hansen (?168 cm tall?), as the shoe is 103 inches long (26 cm), its sole is 32 inches wide (9 cm), while the heel is 3 inches wide (7.5 cm) and 3 inches thick (6 mm). The mud cracked on toes when the wearer of this shoe pushed it backwards to made a next step. In turn around the heel the mud was tired and lifted after it stack to the shoe. During the formation of this footprint its heel stepped on one of first trilobites - i.e. creatures that most probably were then farmed on Earth and inspected by the owner of this shoe. After being stepped on, the trilobite curl up in protection, in a manner as modern bugs would curl if injured. Other trilobite was pushed in mud around toes.

Trilobite lived in the mid-Cambrian era, that means around 550 millions years ago in conventional dating. They were used to life in very hostile environmental conditions in which other organisms were not able to survive. Therefore trilobite are the first organisms on Earth which form permanent remains. In layers which precede this period, only bacteria, algas, and other low forms of life could be found. Therefore the imprint of a human shoe is made in the oldest Earth rock which still contains the permanent remains of living organisms - in this case trilobite. This in turn provides a conclusive proof to the history from subsection B2 that life on Earth was artificially replenished by cosmic farmers who also farm us. It also proves that the civilisation which planted us on Earth is at least 550 millions years more developed then us, and that so long ago it already mastered interstellar travel.

Bill Meister died in 1980s. The original place of finding this shoe imprint was carefully hidden by him (probably in the effect of a telepathic suggestion from UFOs), while the location of this place was recorded on the film in which his wife indicates with her finger the exact location of the imprint on the background of recognisable landscape (this photograph is already lost). The ideas was that this location could be found if a scientific expedition is ever organised (further old human imprints still should be present in this place). In 1999 Mrs Meister donated the imprint to "Creation Research Museum", P.O. Box 309, Glen Rose, Texas 76043-0309, USA (located at: 3102 F.M. 205, Glen Rose); Web site: . Let us hope that UFOnauts do not manage to destroy it silently, as they have done it with other evidence on their occupation of Earth.

=> Figure P32

Fig. P32.
The comparison of two separate photos of a hill from Mars shaped like human face. This hill exists in the Cydonia region of Mars, and is around 1.6 km long. On the left is shown the original photo taken by American mission of Viking from 1976. On the right the same hill is shown photographed by "NASA's Mars Global Surveyor" and send to Earth on 8 April 1998. The above photographs in the combination shown here were published in the article "Martian conspiracy theorists lose face" from the Malaysian weekly SUNday, issue dated on 24 May 1998, page 62.


The above human-like face from Mars is the subject of rather bitter controversy and already has an interesting history. From the first moment of its publishing experts from NASA claim, that it is only a natural hill. In turn many other researchers believes, that it can represent remains from a sculpture of a technical origin. The attempts to-date of finding out what it really is for various mysterious reasons always finish with a defeat. For example the spaceship "Observer" send previously on Mars mysteriously "disappeared" in August 1993. Of course, the above photographs are also not conclusive, because similarly as, according to NASA, nature could form this hill, the same nature could also deform a technical sculpture. Furthermore, UFOnauts that occupy us, who are vitally interested that we never confirm the colonisation of Mars, could sabotage with their UFO vehicle the more meaningful parts of this sculpture. After all, the eventual proving that this hill is a technical sculpture, would provide a proof for the correctness of my theory from subsection V3. This theory states, that Mars was populated earlier than Earth. But because of its low gravity, the length of life of colonists drop below the barrier of self-reproduction, while their height shoot to the size of giants (see descriptions of equations of longevity and height from subsections JE9 and P6.2). Because of this unsuccessful colonisation of Mars, the red planet needed to be pushed aside from the planet that supports life, while its place was taken by Earth, which then was subjected to colonisation with the same as Mars human race.

It is worth to add, that according to legends of New Zealand Maori, a colossal sculpture of a male that lies on its back and stares into sky, supposed to exist in the unpopulated area of New Zealand - see descriptions in subsection V3. Maori call this sculpture a "Sleeping Giant". According to their legends his eyes are staring at the star from which he arrived to Earth. It is described as having smooth and strong brows, widely framed eyes, straight/aquiline nose - (not flat) which gives the impression of power, full "sensual" lips which make an impression that they would laugh when only they return to life, and clearly outlining chin which indicates the power and pride. Of course, the person reading this description may have a doubt about the truthfulness of this legend, because how it would be possible such a gigantic sculpture of a human lasts undiscovered even at the beginning of XXI century, means in times of satellites and space shuttles that continually photograph every centimetre of our planet, and at times when at every area of New Zealand tens of aeroplanes fly everyday. Well, in my opinion it is possible. We must remember that these aeroplanes and space shuttles are piloted, while satellite photographs analysed, by people who are used to thoughtlessly stare into TV sets and chum sandwiches, not to observe and analyse reality that surrounds them. After all, the majority of present orthodox scientists would not notice such a sculpture even when their favourite golf course is located on the nose of this sculpture, while Maori not only told about it in their legends, but also glued its pictures and descriptions to gates of present universities. Because this sculpture strongly confirms the correctness of the alternative history of humanity described in subsection V3, because I myself discovered the site of UFO explosion in Tapanui just on the basis of similar Maori legends described in subsection O5.2 /?/, and also because I would like to guarantee that the information about this sculpture of the "Sleeping Giant" does not disappear as this happened many times with other evidence of operation of UFOs in New Zealand, I decided to record here for future generations the details about this extraordinary sculpture.

=> Q.
Antworten to top



Gehe zu:


Benutzer, die gerade dieses Thema anschauen: 1 Gast/Gäste