M1.6. The physical identity of DNA helixes in a given individual is a proof...
#1
@ Dr. Ing. Jan Pająk

M1.6. The physical identity of DNA helixes in a given individual is a proof that the
counter-matter of DNA is the carrier of software "programs of life and fate"
Motto: "If two physically identical computers work in a drastically different manner, then it means that (1) their work is controlled by software stored in their memories, and that (2) this software is composed of very different programs."

In subsection M1.1 of this volume I explained the principle of operation of time vehicles. This principle reveals, that time travel, construction of "time vehicles", and the access of humans to immortality through the repetitive shifting people back to years of their youth each time they accomplish their old age, are possible because double DNA helixes are most elementary forms of natural computers. These helixes run the software of so-called "programs of life and fate" stored in memory of the "counter-matter", which control the elapse of time in every living creature. Unfortunately, my discoveries of the work of time, manner of shifting back in time, and principles of operation of "time vehicles" - which open for the humanity the access to immortality through allowing people to repeatedly shift back in time to years of their youth each time they arrive to an old age, encountered reception which is rather detrimental for our civilisation. Not only that these discoveries are ignored by well-paid professional scientists, but in addition are persecuted with rude and noisy criticism of internet mob, which is completely deprived of ability for rational thinking and for civilised debating. Clearly, the most hostile inclined persecutors of myself and my research are not discouraged even by these numerous examples of evidence discussed in subsections M1.3 to M1.9 of this volume, nor by my postulates based on facts and logic which are so easily verifiable by everyone. Therefore, in this subsection I decided to provide still another proof which is based on commonly known facts, and which also unambiguously confirms that "double helixes of DNA are actually miniature natural computers which run software 'programs of life and fate' contained in the memory of their 'counter-matter' ".
The proof described here, which confirms that "double helixes of DNA in fact are simplest natural computers that run the software codes of 'programs of life and fate' stored in their memories", is based on a sequence of very elementary empirical findings. The first out of these findings is obvious for everyone. It states, that "every cell of the body displays a different development, function, work, changes, fate, etc." In other words, the "passage through time" for every single cell of living body of a given individual differs from passages through time of remaining cells from the body of the same individual. The second commonly known empirical finding about DNA, is that "the double helixes of DNA can only be used by criminology for identifying an individual from which they originate, because independently from which cell of this individual they are retrieved, their hardware (atomic) structure is still exactly the same".
For example, when soon after formulating the proof described here, on 23 November 2010 I checked what about the use of DNA in criminology is described in internet web pages devoted to this subject, then e.g. on the web page available in that day with the address "www.exploredna.co.uk/dna-and-criminology.html" I found the following statements expressing the above (commonly known) empirical finding - quote from the abovementioned web page: "a person's DNA is the same in all areas of their body, it can't be altered or modified in any way"; and also "DNA is found in blood, skin cells, hair and all around the human body".

Of course, my findings and knowledge on the topic of "counter-matter" - which I described and supported with wide evidence in volumes 1, 4, 5 and this (11) of my monograph [1/5], provide an unambiguous explanation for the empirical findings described above - stating that “the passage through time and fate of completely different cells of body is controlled by DNA which has the same hardware (atomic) structures”. This explanation states, "DNA must contain software 'control programs' written into the intelligent memory of 'counter-matter' that forms the hardware (atomic) structure of these DNA". In other words, double helixes of DNA are actually equivalents of these computers described in the "motto" from this item (which "motto" reminds us the obvious truth that "if exist two physically identical computers which carry out drastically different activities, then this is a proof that such computers (1) contains inside some software that controls their activities, and (2) this software is different in each one of these computers"). After all, as we know it from the use of DNA in criminology, from the physical point of view DNA helixes in a given individual look identical, no matter from which cell they were taken. On the other hand, in each of these cells, the same looking DNA extends the control over a completely different course of the development, function, work, changes, fate, etc. - for a given cell. This in turn would be impossible if the "control program" which these DNA must contain inside, was written in a hardware manner by being "permanently hardwired" into the hardware (atomic) structure of these DNA. In other words, to be that way, DNA must store inside some "programs of live and fate" which have the purely software character.
The fact proven here, that DNA helixes are actually miniature computers with own memories in which they store their "control programs", is also confirmed by various other empirical evidence on which genetics continually is "stumbling". An excellent example of this evidence is the recent discovery regarding "trauma", reported, amongst others, in the article "Trauma research punches hole in Darwin's theory" from page B13 of New Zealand newspaper Weekend Herald, issue dated on Saturday, November 27, 2010. According to this discovery, in people who experiences some serious trauma, e.g. in returning from a war, their DNA is modified, so that consequences of this trauma are passed to next generations of their descendants. But if these next generations do not experience similar trauma, then the content of their DNA returns to previous norm after around 3 generations. Of course, if the information would be carried out by DNA in the manner "permanently hardwired", then such passing consequences of trauma to next generations would be impossible. Unfortunately, present genetics still believes unconditionally in the "permanent hardwiring of DNA information". Therefore, these intermediate modifications of DNA information, genetics still tries to explain as consequences of modifying influences of chemical "epigenetic regulators". But this explanation can be related only to a single individual and it cannot be spread over several generations. Therefore, if we wait another several years, then probably genetics finally has no option but to admit, that DNA helixes are small computers which carry in memories their software "control programs".
The proof described here is immensely important. After all, in addition to the evidence provided in other subsections of this volume, it also confirms the correctness of the principle of operation of "time vehicles" described here, which is to provide people with access to immortality. Furthermore, it also confirms that the "counter-matter" displays attributes of a liquid computer hardware, in memory of which are stored software control programs. In this way it confirms the truth and correctness of everything that about the "counter-matter" (and thus also about e.g. the self-evolution of God from chaotically behaving counter-matter) was already explained, e.g. in item A1.1 from volume 1 of this monograph [1/5] (also in item #E1 of a separate web page named "will.htm"), and it confirms as well the truth of whatever about the creation of the physical world and man by God was explained and supported with evidence in volume 1 of this monograph (also in items #C3 and #C4 of the web page named "God Proof"). In addition, the proof discussed here is helpful in illustrating how thoughtless and how deprived of inquisitiveness are present users of empirical findings about DNA. After all, these users know jolly well, that in every cell from the body of a given individual, DNA controls over a different development, function, work, changes, fate, etc., for this cell. Simultaneously they also know that in a given individual the hardware (atomic) structure of this DNA is sufficiently identical for all cells of the body that on the basis of the DNA taken from any cell, it is possible to identify the entire given individual. In spite of this, none amongst users of DNA to-date come to a conclusion, that such facts confirm that DNA helixes in fact must be kinds of miniature control computers which run software programs stored in their memories. None of them was also noticing, that in order codes contained in DNA could control the development, function, work, changes, fate, etc., of individual cells, there must exist some mechanism of carrying the control commands into cells - while our science to-date has NOT identified such a mechanism yet. In face of such a lack of thinking and inquisitiveness on part of other scientists, is it really in interest of the humanity to still officially ignore my discoveries and outcomes of my research? Is it really worth to take seriously these noisy attacks of internet mob which not only is similarly mindless, but which in addition is also deprived of the specialised knowledge that is required to understand ideas described here?
In order to emphasize the immense significance of the proof described here, and also to formally introduce this proof into a permanent accomplishment of human knowledge, below I am going to repeat this proof in the form that is customary for formal scientific proving according to principles of mathematical logic. So here is the formal scientific proof, stating that "the hardware entities known as DNA double helixes are the most simple forms of natural computers that control the passage of their cells through the time by using software 'programs of life and fate' stored in the memory of 'counter-matter' that constitutes the physical structure of these DNA", completed with the use of methods of mathematical logic:

Theorem:
"The hardware entities known as DNA double helixes are the most simple forms of natural computers that control the passage of their cells through the time with the use of software 'programs of life and fate' stored in the memory of 'counter-matter' that constitutes the physical structure of these DNA".
Basis proposition:
(') The control of development, function, work, changes, fate, etc., of subsequent cells in a living organism, which represents the passage of these cells through time, can occur only if (1) DNA from these cells contain either appropriate programs stored in a software manner (i.e. DNA contain some forms of natural "programs of life and fate" stored in the memory of the "counter-matter" that constitutes these DNA), or if (2) these DNA contain programs stored in a hardware manner (i.e. programs which are "permanently hardwired" into the hardware (atomic) structure of these DNA). The fact that present criminology is able to identify given individuals on the basis of the hardware (atomic) structure of DNA of these individuals taken from any cells of their bodies, proves that the hardware (atomic) structure of these DNA cannot be a carrier of the hardwired code of such a program, because a) this hardware (atomic) structure is identical in all cells of a given individual - and thus it CANNOT reflect the diversities of development, function, work, changes, fate, etc., of subsequent cells in a given organism, and also because b) there is no outside mechanism which would read and implement such a hardwired program. This way the above facts completely exclude the possibility that such controlling programs are "hardwired permanently" into the hardware (atomic) structure of DNA.
(") The above basis proposition can also be expressed in a slightly different manner, for example with words: Control over the development, function, work, changes, fate, etc., of a given cell, which must have a different course for every cell of a given individual, and thus which represents the passage of a given cell through time, may be accomplished either (1) by DNA helixes which are kinds of most elementary natural computers that run appropriate "programs of life and fate" written in a software manner into the memory of "counter-matter" that constitutes these DNA, or can be accomplished (2) by the DNA which are kinds of "permanently hardwired" programs written into the hardware (atomic) structure of these DNA in a hardware manner, and which are later read and implemented by a different mechanism located outside of these DNA. The fact that present criminology is able to identify every individual on the basis of hardware (atomic) structure of the DNA of that individual taken form any cells of his or her body - no matter what is the development, function, work changes, fate, etc., of this cell, proves that the hardware (atomic) structure of these DNA cannot be a carrier of such a "hardware coded program", because a) this hardware (atomic) structure is identical in all cells of a given individual - and thus it does NOT reflect the diversity that is required for expressing the differences in development, function, work, changes, fate, etc., of every single cell from a body, and also because b) for such a "permanently hardwired program" would need to exist a mechanism outside of the DNA which would implement this program - but the science has NOT encountered to-date any trace of it. Thus, the above facts completely eliminate the possibility that such a control program is "hardwired in a hardware manner" into the hardware (atomic) structure of DNA.
Proof:
The above basis proposition is to be transformed with the use of tautological form of the method known under the name of "disjunctive syllogism". This form can be written as [(p || q) && !p] => q, in which the assertion "p" says "the control of development, function, work, changes, fate, etc., of subsequent cells in a living organism, can be so diversified only if the DNA of these cells contain appropriate programs stored in a hardware manner (i.e. the atomic structure of these DNA contains 'permanently hardwired programs of life and fate' )", while the assertion "q" says "the control of development, function, changes, and fate of subsequent cells in a living organism, can be so diversified only if the DNA of these cells contain appropriate programs stored in a software manner (i.e. contain in memories some forms of natural 'programs of life and fate' stored in memory of the 'counter-matter' that constitutes these DNA), while the atomic structure of these DNA is just a simplest form of computer hardware that executes the run of these program". In turn the assertion "!p" states "the fact that present criminology is able to base the identification of individuals on DNA taken from any cells of their bodies, which proves the identical hardware structure of DNA in cells with drastically different development, functions, work, changes, fates, etc., completely eliminates the possibility that programs contained in these DNA are written in a hardware manner by being 'permanently hardwired' into the hardware (atomic) structure of these DNA". The transformation of these propositions implies the conclusion that "the development, functions, changes, and fates of individual cells of a body are so diversified because their DNA contain software programs that describe the passage of a given cell through the time (i.e. DNA helixes contain natural programs stored in memories of the 'counter-matter' that form their atomic structure)".
Conclusion:
The above inference chain unambiguously and conclusively proves the truth of the theorem that "the hardware entities known as DNA helixes are the most simple forms of natural computers that control the passage of their cells through the time with the use of software 'programs of life and fate' stored in the memory of 'counter-matter' that constitutes the physical structure of these DNA".

***
For the use of these readers who are NOT familiar with the notation that is applied in
the above proof, I would like to explain that symbols "p", "q", and "r" mark subsequent "assertions" utilized in this proof as logical variables. In turn symbols "!", "&&", "||", and "=>" mark logical operators "not", "and", "inclusive or", and "implies" (if ... => then ...").
The above proof is just one amongst a series of formal scientific proofs formulated with the methods of mathematical logic, which prove, amongst others, that: (1) "the counter-world does exist" (this "counter-world" is actually another world existing parallel to our "physical world" and filled with the continually moving substance called "counter-matter" which displays attributes of liquid computer hardware) - see subsection H1.1.4 from volume 4 of this monograph (or see item #D3 of the web page named "Dipolar Gravity"), (2) "God does exist" - see subsection I3.3.4 from volume 5 of this monograph (or see item #G2 of the web page "God Proof"), (3) "God created the first pair of people" - see subsection NF9 from volume 12 of this monograph (or see item #B8 of the web page "Evolution"), (4) "people have immortal souls" - see subsection I5.2.1 from volume 5 of this monograph (or see item #C1.1 of the web page named "nirvana.htm"), (5) "DNA are most simple forms of natural computers which control the passage through time of cells in which these DNA reside, while this control of the passage of cells through time they accomplish by a sequential running of software 'programs of life and fate' contained in memories of these DNA" - see subsection M1.6 from volume 11 of this monograph (or see item #D7 of the web page "Immortality"), and also proving that (6) "God authorised the Bible" - see subsection M7.1 from volume 11 of this monograph (or see item #B1 of the web page named "Bible"). I would really encourage readers that for their own good they consider the existence and validity of these proofs in everything that they do in their lives. As I explain this e.g. in item #I3 of the web page named "day26.htm", such consideration can turn out decisive in many life situations and sometimes may even translate into saving the life (instead of dying).
The proof presented above was subjected to the public discussion on internet discussion forums of the "Google" search engine, at addresses indicated in item #E2 of the web page named "FAQ". Furthermore, this proof is also included into item #D7 of the web page named "Immortality".

=> M1.7.
Antworten to top



Gehe zu:


Benutzer, die gerade dieses Thema anschauen: 1 Gast/Gäste